Profile of hypospadias patients at Dr. Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta period 2015-2020

Authors

  • Dedy C. Hariyono Surgery Resident of Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Wibisono . Department of Urology, Dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220621

Keywords:

Hypospadia, Profile, Surakarta

Abstract

Background: Hypospadias is the second most common congenital malformation in males and the most common congenital malformation of the penis. This malformation is characterized by the anatomical position of the urinary tract opening on the ventral or anterior part of the penis. The prevalence of hypospadias in western countries around 8 of 1000 live births and is reported to increase every year.

Methods: This study is a descriptive study with a retrospective cross-sectional approach. All data were retrieved from RSUD Dr. Moewardi Surakarta using hypospadias patients medical records from January 2015 – December 2020. The hypospadias case were classified into mild, moderate, and severe hypospadia based on location. The age of being diagnosed, concomitant congenital disease, surgery technique, and surgical complication were described.

Results: There were 120 cases of hypospadias, consisted of 47.5% severe hypospadias, 34.9% moderate hypospadias and 17.4% mild hypospadias. Patients’ age of being diagnosed was most in the 1-5 years group (35.9%). Seventy-eight (75.7%) cases without concomitant congenital disease, 10.7% with undecensus testiculorum, 4.8% with cyanotic congenital disease, and 3.8% with cloacal. There were 68.9% cases repaired with first-stage surgical technique and 31.1% repaired with two-stage surgical technique. Most surgical complications were meatal stenosis 9%.

Conclusions: Majority of hypospadias cases were severe hypospadia. Other profile like age of being diagnosed, concomitant congenital disease, surgery technique, and surgical complication were found in this study.  

 

References

Donaire A, Mendez. Hypospadias. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. 2020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482122/. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Tangkudung FJ, Patria SY, Arguni E. Faktor Risiko Hipospadia pada Anak di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta. Sari Pediatr. 2016;17(5):396.

Kemenkes RI. Infodatin: Kelainan bawaan. Pus Data dan Inf Kemeterian Kesehat RI. 2018;1-6.

Maritska Z, Santosa A, Ariani MD, Juniarto AZ, Faradz SM. Profile of Hypospadias Cases in Central Java, Indonesia. J Biomed Transl Res. 2015;1(1):16-21.

Chen YF, Huang WY, Chen SC, Guo YJ, Lan CF, Liu SH, et al. Factors associated with delayed pediatric hypospadias surgery in Taiwan: A population-based, nationwide analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112(1):48-53.

MacEdo A, Rondon A, Ortiz V. Hypospadias. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(6):447-52.

Krisna DM, A M. Hipospadia: Bagaimana Karakteristiknya Di Indonesia? Berk Ilm Kedokt Duta Wacana. 2017;2(2):325.

Noegroho BS, Siregar S, Firmansyah I. Karakteristik Pasien Hipospadia di Rumah Sakit Hasan Sadikin Bandung Tahun 2015-2018. Dep Bedah Urol Fak Kedokt Univ Padjajaran. 2018;(38):10-2.

Ullah S, Karimi S, Sabir Khan H, Farooque U, Cheema O, Kumari P, et al. The Success Level of Hypospadias Repair in Adults. Cureus. 2020. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342850285_The_Success_Level_of_Hypospadias_Repair_in_Adults. Accessed on 20 December 2021.

Lin Y-H, Xiao Q, Wang J-S, Jiang Y-G. Clinical study of congenital heart disease accompanied by hypospadias. Natl Cent Biotechnol Inf. 2014;20(2):169-71.

Keays MA, Dave S. Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(1–2):S48-53.

Mensah W, Hesse A, Addy H. Complications of hypospadias surgery: Experience in a tertiary hospital of a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015;12(4):211-6.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles