Clinical outcome of appendectomy: laparoscopic vs open technique

Authors

  • Jan M. Rather Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Sobia Manzoor Department of Anaesthesia, GMC, SGR, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Mubashir Shah Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20215137

Keywords:

Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Open

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency. Appendectomy has been proven to be the standard care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcome and complication rates.

Methods: This was a single centric, retrospective study conducted at SKIMS, Soura from May 2018 to April 2021. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy patients were compared in terms of operative times, conversion rate, complication rates and duration of hospital stay.

Results: Total 120 patients were included in this study with 40 in laparoscopic group while 80 patients in the open group. Increased operative time in laparoscopic group (p=0.033) and longer duration of hospital stay (p=0.021) with open group while as comparable complication rate in both procedures were observed. Higher rates of intra-abdominal collection in laparoscopic group as compared to open group

Conclusions: Both laparoscopic and open appendectomy procedures can be performed routinely for acute appendicitis without the additional risks of complications.

Author Biographies

Jan M. Rather, Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS, Jammu and Kashmir, India

SENIOR RESIDENT, DEPT OF GENERAL AND MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY

Sobia Manzoor, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC, SGR, Jammu and Kashmir, India

SENIOR RESIDENT, DEPT OF ANESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, GMC SRINAGAR

Mubashir Shah, Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS, Jammu and Kashmir, India

ADDITIONAL PROFESSOR, DEPT OF GENERAL AND MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY

References

Costa Navarro D, Jiménez-Fuertes M, Illàn Riquelme A. Laparoscopic appendectomy: quality care and cost-effectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8(1):45-49.

Ali SM, Hassanain M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(4):225-6.

Sotelo-Anaya E, Sánchez-Muñoz P, Ploneda Valencia CF, De la Cerda Trujillo LF, Varela-Muñoz O, Gutiérrez-Chávez C et al. Acute appendicitis in an overweight and obese Mexican population: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;32:6-9.

Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177(3):250-6.

Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(31):4909-14.

Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Moroney JR, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic vs Open Appendectomy in Obese Patients: Outcomes Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):88-9.

Ingram AP, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Esposito TJ. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. 2010;148(4):625-35.

Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88(2):200-5.

Mascolino A, Scerrino G, Gullo R, Genova C, Melfa GI, Raspanti C et al. Large retroperitoneal abscess extended to the inferior right limb secondary to a perforated ileal Crohn’s disease: the importance of the multidisciplinary approach. G Chir. 2016;37(1):37-41.

Paladino NC, Inviati A, Di Paola V, Busuito G, Amodio E, Bonventre S et al. Predictive factors of mortality in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: A retrospective study. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85(3):265-70.

Paterson HM, Qadan M, De Luca SM, Nixon SJ, Paterson Brown S. Changing Trends in Surgery for acute appendicitis, Br J Surg. 2008;95(3):363-8.

Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr. Intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicitis. J Gastroentest Surg. 1997;1(2):188-92.

Tashiro J, Einstein SA, Perez EA, Bronson SN, Lasko DS, Sola JE. Hospital preference of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Effects on outcomes in simple and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(5):804-9.

Vallina VL, Velasco JM, McCulloch CS. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218(5):685-92.

Tarnoff M, Atabek U, Goodman M, Alexander JB, Chrzanowski F, Mortman K et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. JSLS. 1998;2(2):153-8.

Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C. Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report on 388 operations. Surg Endosc. 1990;4(1):6-9.

Yu G, Han A, Wang W. Comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in treating children with appendicitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(2):299-304.

Salamone G, Licari L, Atzeni J, Tutino R, Gulotta G. Histologic considerations about a rare case of recurrent incisional hernia on McBurney incision. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85pii:S2239253X14022828.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles