Operative management and outcomes of brachial artery revascularization following delayed presentation of traumatic brachial artery injury: surgical persistence rewarded

Authors

  • Madhur Kumar Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Subrata Pramanik Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Anubhav Gupta Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20212273

Keywords:

Brachial artery, Delayed revascularization, Trauma, Limb salvage

Abstract

Background: Dearth of expertise to manage vascular trauma spiraled with delay in diagnosis and referral to tertiary care centers continue to plague a developing nation like India. The brachial artery is the commonest artery to be injured in extremity following trauma. Although the patients present late, revascularization to salvage the limb and to maintain its function is advocated. This retrospective study was done to evaluate the management and outcomes of brachial artery revascularization in patients with delayed presentation of traumatic brachial artery injury.

Methods: Twenty-six patients of traumatic brachial artery injury who met the inclusion criteria during 1-year study period (August 2019 to July 2020) were included. Patients with iatrogenic vascular injury, severe vascular injury associated with massive orthopaedic neuromuscular injury (i.e., crush injury), mottled upper limb and injury to neck, chest, abdomen, lower limbs or any pseudoaneurysm were excluded. Data were analysed.

Results: Amongst 26 patients studied, 24 (92.30%) patients had complete transection of the artery. Of these, 19 (79.16%) had primary repair in the form of end-to-end anastomosis and 7 (29.16%) underwent reverse interposition saphenous vein grafting. Two patients with partial laceration of brachial artery underwent primary (lateral) repair. Associated fracture of humerus was managed with internal fixation following revascularization. Four cases underwent end to end repair of median nerve. Majority, 22 (84.61%) had good functional outcome and 4 (15.38%) had satisfactory functional results. Limb salvage rates was 100%.

Conclusions: Revascularization beyond warm ischemia time is still desirable to prevent limb loss. Traumatic neurological injury affects the functional outcome.

 

Author Biographies

Madhur Kumar, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India

DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOTHORACIC & VASCULAR SURGERY
VARDHMAN MAHAVIR MEDICAL COLLEGE & SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL, NEW DELHI

Subrata Pramanik, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India

DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOTHORACIC & VASCULAR SURGERY
VARDHMAN MAHAVIR MEDICAL COLLEGE & SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL, NEW DELHI

Anubhav Gupta, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India

DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOTHORACIC & VASCULAR SURGERY
VARDHMAN MAHAVIR MEDICAL COLLEGE & SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL, NEW DELHI

References

Edaigbini SA, Delia IZ, Aminu MB, Bosan IB, Ibrahim A, Anumenechi N. Vascular surgeries in West Africa: challenges and prospects. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(5):552-7.

Lerner BE, Moscati RM. The Golden Hour: Scientific Fact or Medical “Urban Legend”? Acad Emergency Med. 2001;8(7):758-60.

Franz RW, Goodwin RB, Hartman JF, Wright ML. Management of upper extremity arterial injuries at an urban level I trauma center. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;23(1):8-16.

Zellweger R, Hess F, Nicol A, Omoshoro-Jones J, Kahn D, Navsaria P. An analysis of 124 surgically managed brachial artery injuries. Am J Surg. 2004;188(3):240-5.

Moini M, Hamedani K, Rasouli MR, Nouri M. Outcome of delayed brachial artery repair in patients with traumatic brachial artery injury: prospective study. Int J Surg. 2008;6(1):20-2.

Ergnes K, Yilik L, Ozsoyler I, Kestelli M, Ozbek C, Gurbuz A. Traumatic brachial artery injuries. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(1):31-4.

Joshipura MK. Trauma care in India: current scenario. World J Surg. 2008;32(8):1613-17.

Adebo OA, Osinowo OO. Management of Peripheral Arterial Injuries at Ibadan: Case Report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 1986;20(1):55-60.

Ekim H, Tuncer M. Management of traumatic brachial artery injuries: a report on 49 patients. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(2):105-9.

McCroskey BL, Moore EE, Pearce WH, Moore FA, Cota R, Sawyer JD. Traumatic injuries of the brachial artery. Am J Surg. 1988;156(6):553-5.

Simmons JD, Schmieg RE, Porter JM, D’Souza SE, Duchesne JC, Mitchell ME. Brachial artery injuries in a rural catchment trauma center: are the upper and lower extremity the same? J Trauma. 2008;65(2):327-30.

Ergüne_ K, Yillik L, Özsöyler I. Traumatic brachial artery injuries. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33:31-4.

Visser PA, Hermreck AS, Pierce GE, Thomas JH, Hardin CA. Prognosis of nerve injuries incurred during acute trauma to peripheral arteries. Am J Surg. 1980;140:596-9.

Rich NM, Spencer FC. Vascular trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1978;125-56.

Hardin WD Jr, O'Connell RC, Adinolfi MF, Kerstein MD. Traumatic arterial injuries of the upper extremity: determinants of disability. Am J Surg. 1985;150:266-70.

McCready RA. Upper-extremity vascular injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 1988;68:725-40.

Yavuz S, Tiryakioglu O, Celkan A, Mavi M, Ozdemir A. Emergency surgical procedures in the peripheral vascular injuries. Turk J Vasc Surg. 2000;1:15-20.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles