DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20204408

Randomised controlled study of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure

Tarek M. Sehsah, Osama H. Abd-Raboh, Taha A. Ismail, Soliman M. Soliman

Abstract


Background: Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure has been increasingly practiced worldwide since the laparoscopic era. However, so far only a few studies have been published regarding the results of this procedure. Aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s (LHR) versus open reversal of Hartmann’s (OHR) procedure regarding to operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, postoperative complications and cost.

Methods: This study was conducted on 40 patients with Hartmann’s colostomy admitted to the general surgery department, Tanta university hospitals, during the period from February 2017 to August 2019.

Results: Regarding operative time, it was with a mean value 274.75±80.65 min in the LHR group and 156.75±32.81 min in the OHR group. The difference in time to pass flatus was with a mean value 1.78±0.68 days in the LHR group and 2.49±0.78 days in the OHR group. The difference in the hospital stay was with mean value 6.1±2.47 days in the LHR group and 9.3±2.20 days in the OHR group. Regarding post-operative complications; 6 patients (30%) developed post-operative complications while in the OHR group 10 (50%).

Conclusions: In this era of minimal-access surgery and with increasing attention to fast-track protocols, we believe the laparoscopic approach should be the standard technique for patients undergoing reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. However, laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure needs a surgical learning curve.


Keywords


Laparoscopy, Hartmann’s reversal, Minimally invasive, Adhesiolysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Krouse RS, Herrinton LJ, Grant M, Wendel CS, Green SB, Mohler MJ et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. J Am Society of Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4664-70.

Keck JO, Collopy BT, Ryan PJ, Fink R, Mackay JR, Woods RJ. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(3):243-8.

Oomen JL, Cuesta MA, Engel AF. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure after surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is safe and possible in most patients. Digestive surg. 2005;22(6):419-25.

Butler DL. Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery: a review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36(5):513-9;20-1.

Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A, Brown C, Brodribb AJ. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg. 1991;78(10):1167-70.

Kunin N, Letoquart JP, La Gamma A, Chaperon J, Renaud B, Lucas A et al. Restoration of colonic continuity after Hartmann's operation. J de chirurgie. 1992;129(12):526-30.

Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ. Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg. 1992;79(8):839-41.

Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE, Spalding EM, Rainey JB. Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann's procedure: the Lothian experience 1987-1992. Br J Surg. 1995;82(1):27-30.

Hartmann H. Chirurgie du rectum. 1921. Available at: http://www.grandroundsjournal.com/articles/ gr089001/hartmann-original.pdf. Accessed on 2 September 2020.

Khosraviani K, Campbell WJ, Parks TG, Irwin ST. Hartmann procedure revisited. Eu j surg Acta chirurgica. 2000;166(11):878-81.

Desai DC, Brennan EJ Jr, Reilly JF, Smink RD Jr. The utility of the Hartmann procedure. Am J Surg. 1998;175(2):152-4.

Gorey T, O'connell P, Waldron D, Cronin Kerin K, Fitzpatrick J. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Bri j surg. 1993;80(1):109.

Anderson CA, Fowler DL, White S, Wintz N. Laparoscopic Colostomy Closure. Surg Laparo Endo Percutaneous Tech. 1993;3(1):69-72.

Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. Am J Surg. 2005;189(6):670-4.

Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(8):733-41.

Brathwaite S, Kuhrt M, Yu L, Arnold M, Husain S, Harzman AE. Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann's Reversal: A Single-Institution Experience. Surg laparo endo percutaneous tech. 2015;25(5):e156-8.

Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K, Nguyen SQ, Lipskar A, Weber KJ et al. Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure-a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endo. 2009;23(3):496-502.

Kwak HD, Kim J, Kang DW, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim SH. Hartmann's reversal: a comparative study between laparoscopic and open approaches. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(5):450-4.

Haughn C, Ju B, Uchal M, Arnaud JP, Reed JF, Bergamaschi R. Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open vs. laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(8):1232-6.

Yang PF, Morgan MJ. Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(12):965-9.

Toro A, Ardiri A, Mannino M, Politi A, Di Stefano A, Aftab Z et al. Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: State of the Art 20 Years after the First Reported Case. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:530140.

Richards CH, Roxburgh CS. Scottish Surgical Research G. Surgical outcome in patients undergoing reversal of Hartmann's procedures: a multicentre study. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(3):242-9.

Ng DC, Guarino S, Yau SL, Fok BK, Cheung HY, Li MK et al. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: safety and feasibility. Gastroenterol Report. 2013;1(2):149-52.