DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20164080

Predicting difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by clinical, hematological and radiological evaluation

Chandrashekhar Naik G., Kailas C. T.

Abstract


Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. It has revolutionized minimally invasive procedures. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be rendered difficult by various problems encountered during surgery. The aim of this study was to predict difficulty of LC and possibility of conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) before surgery using the clinical, haematological and ultrasonographic criteria.

Methods: This study was carried out on 50 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, non-dilated bile ducts. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasound examination. All cases underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with assessment of the difficulties encountered.

Results: LC was successfully accomplished in 49 patients (98%) with a mean operative time of65.122 ± 26.87 minutes. Adhesions present in 14 cases (28%). Gall bladder bed dissection was difficult in 4 patients (8%). Aberrant anatomy present in 4 cases (8 %) while stone spillage occurred in 3 patients (6%) and were all retrieved. Extraction of the excised gall bladder was difficult in 4 patients (8%). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 1 patients (2%). The preoperative parameters that significantly predicted difficult LC were based on the presence of BMI >27.5, history of prior hospitalization, palpable gallbladder, ultrasonographic features of impacted stone and gall bladder wall thickening.

Conclusions: Preoperative evaluatuion may help predict a difficult LC. This information may be useful to both the patient and the treating surgeon. 


Keywords


Cholecystectomy, Evaluation, Laparoscopy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M. The Europian experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991;161:385-7.

Southern Surgeon Club. A Prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1073-8.

Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM. Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg. 1996;135:98-101.

Simopoulos. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endoscopy. 2005:19(7):905-9.

Lein HH, Huang CS. Male gander: risk factor for severe symptomatic cholelithiasis. World J Surg. 2002;26:598-601.

Simopoulos, Constantinos, Polychonidis, Alexandros, Botaitis, Sotirios. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients. Obesity Surg. 2005;15:243-6.

Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh B, Rajnacova A, Goh PM. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 1997;21:629-33.

Hutchinson CH, Traverso LW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open? Surg Endosc. 1994;8:875-8.

Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL. Laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy : Comparison of early results. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:114-8.

Kama N, Doganay M, Dolapci M, Reis E. Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic chole-cystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:965-8.

Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JR Coll Surg Edinb. 1999;44:187-92.

Tayeb M, Raza SA, Khan MR, Azami R. Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51:17-20.

Livingstone EH, Rege RV. A nation-wide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188:205-11.

Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Croxford R, Strasberg Sm. Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystecomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:696-704.

Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, Cohen A, Abrahamson J, Elder S. Laparoscopic cholecystecomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:755-60.