DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20160245

A comparative study of functional outcome following internal fixation and conservative management: in non-union clavicle

Saroj Kumar Patra, Bishnu Prasad Patro, Mahesh Chandra Sahu, Sidharth Samal

Abstract


Background: Clavicle is the only long bone which is horizontally placed and known for its unique characteristics. Clavicle fracture accounts for almost 2% of total fractures. Most fractures occur in middle third of clavicle and common in young male patients. As of literature 15% clavicle fracture leads to non -union with decrease functional outcome and decreased Constant and DASH shoulder score. Most orthopedician prefer conservative management unless otherwise definitive indications for surgery like compound fracture or gross displacement with tenting of skin. We tried to find out the functional impairment following non-union of clavicle and its outcome following internal fixation and conservative management.

Methods: In a prospective study 15 patients of non-union clavicle were treated either by internal fixation with bone grafting or by conservative method as per patient will.  Six patients were treated with LCDCP with cancellous iliac bone graft and nine patients by conservative management. Constant shoulder score and DASH score of all patients were taken at 2, 6 and 12 month. Both the groups were compared in terms of functional outcome and radiological union. Besides we tried to found out the cause of non-union retrospectively with previous mode of management and old radiographs.

Results: We had operated six patients with Plate and screws with cancellous bone graft and rest nine patients by conservative management. At one year follow up operated patients had significant improvement in DASH and Constant shoulder scores with good radiological union compared to the conservative patients.

Conclusions: All young patients with displaced middle 1/3rd clavicle fractures should be considered for surgical fixation. Patient with non-union of clavicle with compromised shoulder function can also return to their normal shoulder function following surgery. Plate screw with bone grafting had good results in all six cases. In the conservative group shoulder function was always less in the affected side compared to their normal side.


Keywords


Clavicle, Non-union, Conservative, Locking plate, Screws

Full Text:

PDF

References


Neer CS. II Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:43-50.

Meijden VOA, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Treatment of clavicle fractures: current concepts review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(3):423-9.

Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(3):461-4.

Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1998;80(3):476-84.

Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-6.

Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:71-4.

McKee MD. Clavicle fractures in 2010: Sling/swathe or open reduction and internal fixation? Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:225-31.

Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD. Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma working group. Treatment of acute mid shaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 214 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma working group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:504-7.

Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of non-union following non operative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1359-65.

Brinker MR, Edwards TB, O’Connor DP. Estimating the risk of non-union following non operative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):676-7.

Ban I, Branner U, Holck K, Krasheninnikoff M, Troelsen A. Clavicle fractures may be conservatively treated with acceptable results-a systematic review. Danish Med J. 2012;59:1-7.

Bajuri MY, Maidin S, Rauf A, Baharuddin M, Harjeet S. Functional outcomes of conservatively treated clavicle fractures. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66:635-9.

Ledger M, Leeks N, Ackland T, Wang A. Short malunions of the clavicle: An anatomic and functional study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:349-54.

Hillen RJ, Burger BJ, Poll RG, de Gast A, Robinson CM. Malunion after mid shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:273-9.

McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, et al. Deficits following non-operative treatment of displaced mid shaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:35-40.

Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Non-operative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced mid shaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1-10.

Potter JM, Jones C, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Does delay matter? The restoration of objectively measured shoulder strength and patient-oriented outcome after immediate fixation versus delayed reconstruction of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:514-18.