Utility of triple tumor markers CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in predicting advanced stage of carcinoma gallbladder: a retrospective study

Authors

  • Navin Kumar Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-1386
  • Deepak Rajput Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Amit Gupta Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Varun Popuri Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Ashikesh Kundal Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Jyoti Sharma Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Nisanth Puliyath Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Sruthi Shasheendran Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203049

Keywords:

Tumor markers in carcinoma gallbladder, Cut-off value of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in metastatic carcinoma gallbladder, Specific tumor markers in gallbladder cancer

Abstract

Background: A combination of serum tumor markers are used in the evaluation and prognosis of carcinoma gallbladder (GBC). Aim of the study was to find the significance of combined use of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in advanced stage of GBC and to find the cut-off value of each of these tumor markers in metastatic GBC.   

Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study over 1 year, which was carried out in 42 cases of advanced GBC. The patients were grouped in to locally advanced and metastatic stage on the basis of CECT scan findings. CA19-9, CA125 and CEA were assayed in all patients. These tumor markers were analysed with these two groups of GBCs. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software v3.6.2.

Results: Out of 42 cases CA19-9 was elevated in 18 (78%), CA125 in 16 (70%) and CEA in 9 (39%) patients with metastatic disease. The cut-off value of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA was determined by ROC curve were >109 U/ml, 55.4 U/ml and 2.56 μg/l respectively. CA19-9 had the highest sensitivity 78.3% followed by CA125 69.6% and CEA has the highest specificity 68.4% for the diagnosis of metastatic stage of the disease. Specificity of these tumor markers were highest when used in combination.

Conclusions: Combined use of triple tumor markers increases its specificity in the diagnosis of advanced stage of GBC but their cut-off level is statistically not significant in predicting metastatic GBC.

Author Biographies

Navin Kumar, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery.

Deepak Rajput, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery.

Amit Gupta, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Additional Professor, Department of General Surgery

Varun Popuri, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Ashikesh Kundal, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Jyoti Sharma, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Nisanth Puliyath, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Sruthi Shasheendran, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery

References

Hundal R, Shaffer EA. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:99-109.

Wistuba II, Gazdar AF. Gallbladder cancer: lessons from a rare tumour. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:695-706.

Chaube A, Tewari M, Singh U, Shukla HS. CA 125: a potential tumor marker for gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93(8):665‐9.

Donnel MAC, Kirk VEA, Austin KJ. Expression of CA 125 by progetational bovine endometrium: Prospective regulation and function. Reproduction. 2003;126:615-20.

Nouwen EJ, Pollet DE, Eerdeckens MW. Immunohistochemical localization of placental alkaline phosphatase, carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 125 in normal and neoplastic human lung. Cancer Res. 1986;46:866-76.

Canney P, Moore M, Wilkinson P. Ovarian cancer antigen CA125; a prospective clinical assessment of the role as a tumour marker. Br J Cancer. 1984;50:765-9.

Speers CW, Hayes DF. Tumor Biomarkers. In: De Vita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 11th ed. LWW Wolters Kluwer; 2018:974-975.

Zhang Y, Yang J, Li H, Wu Y, Zhang H, Chen W, et al. Tumor markers CA19-9, CA242 and CEA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11683-91.

Reitz D, Gerger A, Seidel J, Kornprat P, Samonigg H, Stotz M, et al. Combination of tumour markers CEA and CA19-9 improves the prognostic prediction in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:427-33.

Goonetilleke KS, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:266-70.

Hatzaras I, Schmidt C, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Bloomston M, et al. Elevated CA 19-9 portends poor prognosis in patients undergoing resection of biliary malignancies. HPB. 2010;12:134-8.

Wang YF, Feng FL, Zhao XH. Combined detection tumor markers for diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4085‐92.

Grunnet M, Sorensen MM. Serum tumor markers in bile duct cancer: a review. Biomarkers. 2014;19:437-43.

Shukla VK, Gurubachan, Sharma D, Dixit VK, Usha. Diagnostic value of serum CA242, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 125 in patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder. Trop Gastroenterol. 2006;27(4):160‐5.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles