DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203782

Single layer versus double layer intestinal anastomoses: a comparative study

Ajit Kumar, Vinod Kumar

Abstract


Background: There are still conflicting views regarding suitability of single layer and double layer anastomotic technique. This prospective single blinded randomized comparative study conducted at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences to assess various aspects viz. safety, efficacy, duration of hospital stays and chances of perforation in single- and double-layer anastomotic surgery.

Methods: 26 patients each in single layer and double layer anastomosis group were included in the study.  Single layer intestinal anastomosis was carried using extramucosal technique with 2-0 vicryl suture (round body). Double layer anastomosis was carried out using interrupted 3-0 silk lembert sutures for the outer layer and a continuous 2-0 vicryl for the inner layer. End to end colocolic, end to end ileocolic, end to side ileocolic, end to end ileoileal, side to side ileoileal, end to end jejunoileal and end to end jejunojejunal anastomosis were performed. Each group was compared for anastomotic leak, time required to construct the anastomosis, cost incurred, and length of hospital stay.

Results: Findings of the study indicated that single layer is economical in comparison to double layer anastomosis and took significant less time to operate. There was no significant difference in hospital stay of the patients in two groups. There was no anastomotic leak in group-S (single layer) while one (3.8%) patient in group-D (double layer) suffered from anastomotic leak.

Conclusions: It was concluded that single layer anastomosis method is beneficial and safe as it required less operative time, suturing material and no leak took place after surgery.


Keywords


Anastomosis, Single layer, Double layer, Anastomotic leak

Full Text:

PDF

References


Senn N. Enterorrhaphy: its history, technic, and present status. JAMA. 1893;21:215.

Cha J, Shademan A, Le HN, Decker R, Kim PCW, Kang JU, Krieger A. Multispectral tissue characterization for intestinal anastomosis optimization. J Biomed Opt. 2015;20(10).

Saha H, Ghosh D, Ghosh T, Burman S, Saha K. Demographic study and management of colonic atresia: single-centre experience with review of literature. J Ind Ass Ped Surg. 2018;23(4):206-11.

Hiranyakas A, Da Silva G, Denoya P, Shawki S, Wexner SD. Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(4):371-5.

Goulder F. Bowel anastomoses: the theory, the practice and the evidence base. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;4(9):208-13.

Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H. Surgery of the small and large bowel. Maingot’s abdominal operations. Stamford: appleton and lange. 1997:1309-10.

Kosuge M, Eto K, Hashizume R, Takeda M, Tomori K, Neki K, Mitsumori N, Yanaga K. Which is the safer anastomotic method for colon surgery? - Ten-year Results. In Vivo. 2017;31(4):683-7.

Shikata S, Yamagishi H, Taji Y, Shimada T, Noguchi Y. Single versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. BMC Surgery. 2006;6:2.

Vargus MG, Sardaneta MLM, Reyes DP, Justo-Janeiro JM. Intestinal anastomosis. Clin Surg. 2018,3:1854-6.

Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT, Fink RJ, Mackay JR, Keck JO. Early feeding after elective open colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68(2):125-8.

Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Offner PJ: Single layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231(6):832.

Bhargava GS, Singh H, Singh J. Single or double layer intestinal anastomosis? Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):2173-6.

Khan HF, Ahmed B, Dilawaiz M, Akram M. Intestinal anastomosis; comparative evaluation of safety, cost effectiveness, morbidity and complication of single versus double layer. Professional Med J. 2010;17(2):232-4.

Ahmed N. Comparative study between single layers versus double layered bowel anastomosis in tertiary care hospital. Dissertation to Rajiv Gandhi University Medical Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka. 2014;82-95.

Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR. Merrie AEH. Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:579–85.

Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1973;60(6):461-4.