DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202819

Neurobehavioral sequelae of moderate traumatic brain injury

Jijo Joseph Joseph, Prasanth Asher, Varun Singh Pendro, Anilkumar Peethambaran, Rajmohan Bhanu Prabhakar

Abstract


Background: The goal of providing neurobehavioural rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors still remains largely unachieved, as the problem is still neglected. This study analysed the change in behavioural sequelae in TBI patients over a period of twelve months, so that appropriate measures may be taken for their adequate rehabilitation.

Methods: All patients admitted with moderate TBI, aged between 15 and 60 years, during the study period of one year, or until the sample size (n=118) was reached, were included in the study. The initial details regarding the mechanism of injury and the initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS), number of days in intensive care unit (ICU), and so on were recorded. At follow up periods of six months and one year, the neuro behavioral rating scale was used in the review clinic to assess the change in neuro behavioral status. Data was analyzed using SPSS.

Results: Out of the 118 subjects included in the study, there was statistically significant improvement in inattention, disorientation, expressive deficit, memory deficit, inaccurate insight, depressive mood, hallucinatory behaviour, unusual thought content, comprehension deficit, speech articulation defect, and so on. There was worsening of anxiety, guilt, tension, etc. There was no much change in somatic concern, hostility and so on.

Conclusions: In view of significant worsening of behavioural components, this study has highlighted the need for individualized regimens for overall rehabilitation of the victims, thereby lessening burden on the patient, family and society.


Keywords


TBI, Neurobehavioural sequelae, Moderate TBI, Neuro rehabilitation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Consensus conference: Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH consensus development panel on rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. JAMA. 1999;282:974-83.

CDC. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: fact sheet. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016.

Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2005;148:255-68.

Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):1-16.

National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), 2010; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 2010; Vital Statistics System (NVSS); 2010.

Pruthi N, Ashok M, Kumar VS, Jhavar K, Sampath S, Devi BI. Magnitude of pedestrian head injuries and fatalities in Bangalore, south India: A retrospective study from an apex neurotrauma center. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:1039-43.

Gururaj G, Kolluri SV, Chandramouli BA, Subbakrishna DK, Kraus JF. Traumatic Brain Injury. Bangalore: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences; 2005.

Langlois JA, Marr A, Mitchko J, Johnson RL. Tracking the silent epidemic and educating the public: CDC’s traumatic brain injury associated activities under the TBI Act of 1996 and the Children’s Health Act of 2000. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20:196-204.

Coronado VG, Thomas KE, Sattin RW, Johnson RL. The CDC traumatic brain injury surveillance system: characteristics of persons aged 65 years and older hospitalized with a TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20:215-28.

Delmonico RL, Peterson HP, Englander J. Group psychotherapy for persons with traumatic brain injury: Management of frustration and substance abuse. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(6):10-22.

Stansfield K. Adaptation of family members of brain-injured patients: Perceptions of the hospitalization event. Axon. 1990:71-5.

Gainer R. The resumption of social role activities following severe brain injury: A decade later. Best Practices in Brain Injury Service Delivery XIII, Brain Injury Association of Iowa Conference 2005, Des Moines, IA.

Torrey EF. The Mind Game - Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists. New York0: Emerson Hall Publishers, Inc; 1972.

Tennant A, Dermott MN, Neary D. The long-term outcome of head injury: Implications for service planning. Brain Inj. 1995;9(6):595-605.

Man DW. Family caregivers’ reactions and coping for persons with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16(12):1025-37.

Meyer FAR, Meyer FKS. The coping process after traumatic brain injury. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1988;17:51-3.

Dring R. The informal caregiver responsible for home care of the individual with cognitive dysfunction following brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 1989;21(1):42-5.

Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81-4.

Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE. The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:183-93.

Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep. 1962;10:799-812.