DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20200287

Role of drains in cases of peptic ulcer perforations: comparison between single drain versus no drain

Rajneesh Kumar, Ankur Hastir, Lakshay Chopra, Sonali Jindal, R. P. S. Walia, Subhash Goyal

Abstract


Background: Peptic ulcer perforation is one of the commonest causes of peritonitis and needs immediate surgical intervention after prompt resuscitation if mortality and morbidity are to be contained. Aims and objectives of the study was to compare role of Intra-abdominal drains prophylactically after plugging of these perforations single drain or no drain.

Methods: In this study, we compared the relative safety and efficacy of putting single drain prophylactically near operation site or in natural abdominal fossae (hepato-renal pouch or sub hepatic) and no drain in cases of peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation. Study was done on 60 patients (one drain put in 30 patients Group A and no drain was put in other 30 patients of Group B). We handle the perforation after thorough peritoneal lavage with warm saline and metrogyl. All the perforation was closed by Grahm’s Patch.

Results: No significant difference between drain and non-drain group as far age and sex concerned. Significant difference was seen in operative duration, hospital stay, wound dehiscence and post-operative fever, intraperitoneal collection or abscess formation. So use of drains are not effective in preventing post-operative infection rather there are chances of its blockage due to debris, intestine or omentum and tubes itself are source of infection as foreign body and there are chances of migration of bacteria from exterior to peritoneal cavity via these drains.

Conclusions: Non drainage of peritoneal cavity after peptic ulcer perforation surgery is an effective method to reduce operative duration, hospital stay and wound dehiscence and post-operative pyrexia.


Keywords


Peptic ulcer, Peritonitis, Tube drain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tait L. Method of cleansing the peritoneum. Brit Gynecol J. 1887;3:185-7.

Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien P. A Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses Ann Surg. 2004;240(6):1074-85.

Sagar PM, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, MacFie J. Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1993;80(6):769-71.

Kumar M, Yang SB, Jaiswal VK, Shah JN, Shreshtha M, Gongal R. Is prophylactic placement of drains necessary after subtotal gastrectomy? World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(27):3738-41.

Alvarez Uslar R, Molina H, Torres O, Cancino A. Total gastrectomy with or without abdominal drains. A prospective randomized trial. Rev Esp Enferm Dig.2005;97:562-9.

Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri M H, Damm P, Jensen R. A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30(6):449-52.

Nora PF, Vanecko RM, Bransfield JJ. Prophylactic abdominal drains. Arch Surg. 1972;105:173-6.

Raves JJ, Slifkin M, Diamond DL. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit

Drainage. Am J Surg. 1984;148:618-20.

Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010; 252:207-14.

Buchler MW, Friess H. Evidence forward, drainage on retreat: Still we ignore abdominal drain!? Ann Surg. 2006;244:8-9.

Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Coit DG, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg. 2001;234:487-94.

Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: Prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1-7.

Guyot A, Layer G. MRSA - 'bug-bear' of a surgical practice: reducing the incidence of MRSA surgical site infections. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Mar 88(2):222-3.

Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, et al. Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2006;23:203-8.

Billroth T. Clinical Surgery. London: The New Sydenham Society;1881.

Delbert P. Recherches experimentelle sur la lavage au peritoneum. Ann Gynae Obstet. 1889; 32:165-97.

Pearl ML, Rayburn WF. Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review. J Reprod Med. 2004:49(8):662-70.

Sullivan B. Nursing management of patients with a chest drain. Br J Nurs. 2008;17(6):388-93.

Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, Jagdish S, Gupta A. Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:210-13.

Ansari MM, Akhtar A, Haleem S, Husain M, Kumar A. Is there a role of abdominal drainage in primarily repaired perforated peptic ulcers? J Exp Integr Med. 2011;2:47-54.

Stone HH, Hooper CA, Millikan WJ. Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1978;187:606-12.

Danadapat MC, Panda C. A perforated appendix: should we drain? J Indian Med Assoc. 1992;90:147-8.

Grahm RR. Treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937;64:235-8.

Tsujinaka S, Konishi F. Drain vs no drain after colorectal surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2011;2(1):3-8.

Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234(2):181-9.

Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part II. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:633-730.

Mawalla B, Mshana SE, Chalya PL, Imirzalioglu C, Mahalu W. Predictors of surgical infections among patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Surg. 2011;11:21.

Shahane V, Bhawal S, Lele U. Surgical site infections: A one year prospective study in a tertiary care centre. Inter J Health Sci, Qassim University. 2012;6(1):79-84.

Levy M. Intra peritoneal drainage. Am J Surg. 1984; 147:309-14.

Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:559-623.

Magarey CJ, Rickford CR, Chant AD, Magarey JR. Peritoneal drainage and systemic antibiotics after appendicectomy: a prospective trial. Lancet. 1971;298(7717):179-82.

Haller Jr JA, Shaker IJ, Donahoo JS, Schnaufer L, White JJ. Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 1973;177(5):595-600.

Sagar PM, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, Mac Fie J. Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:769-71.