Comparative study between laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal and open mesh hernioplasty in repair of non-complicated inguinal hernia

Authors

  • Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny Department of General Surgery, Tanta faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195944

Keywords:

Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach hernioplasty, Lichtenstein repair, Polypropylene mesh

Abstract

Background: Inguinal mesh hernioplasty is one of the common procedures performed all over the world. It can be done either through open or laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of Lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty versus laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair considering, duration of the surgery, hospital stay, and duration to resume normal activity, degree of postoperative pain, wound infection, recurrence and complications.

Methods: Adult patients presented to the general surgical OPD, with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia underwent either Lichtenstein repair or laparoscopic repair by TAPP.

Results: Patients in Group A (open-repair) had significantly greater level of local pain during rest and during routine activities than those within Group B (laparoscopic group) during the postoperative period assessed on the visual-analogue scale. Mean operative time for open hernia repair was 43.7 minutes and for laparoscopic hernia repair was 59.03 minutes and the difference were statistically significant (p=0.0001). The mean duration of hospital stay for open hernia repair was 2.16 days and that for laparoscopic hernia repair was 1.08 days with a (p=0.00001) which was statistically significant. The time to resume routine activities was much shorter among Group B patients than patients in Group A. Only one recurrence (3.3%) was seen in Group B after 6 months follow up.

Conclusions: It is concluded that laparoscopic TAPP repair of inguinal hernia in adults is safe and preferred operation as compared to open inguinal hernia repair.

Author Biography

Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny, Department of General Surgery, Tanta faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt

lecturer of general surgery, PHD

References

LeBlanc K, Kingsnorth A. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1561-71.

Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157(2):188-93.

Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery.10th Ed. Mc Graw Hill; 2015.

Primatesta P, Golacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair, incidence of elective and emergency surgery. Int J Epidemol. 1996;25:835-9.

Schools IG, Van Dijkman B, Butzelaar RM, Van Geldere D, Simons MP. Inguinal hernia repair in Amsterdam region. Hernia. 2001;5(1):37-40.

Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Phillips K. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD006583.

El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish AS, Al Salloum AA, Al Omar AA, Qurachi MM. Regional variation inprevalence of overweight and obesity in Saudi children and adolescents. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:129-32.

DeMaria EJ, Carmody BJ. Perioperative management of special populations: obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:1283-9.

Matthews RD. Inguinal hernia in the 21st century: An evidence-based review. Current Prob Surg. 2008;45:261.

Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, et al. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):95-101.

Kingsnorth A. Editorial: treating inguinal hernias. BMJ.2004;328:59-60.

Lindstro¨m D, Sadr Azodi O, Bellocco R, Wladis A, Linder S, Adami J. The effect of tobacco consumption and body mass index on complications and hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia. 2007;11:117-23.

Rı´os A, Rodrı´guez JM, Munitiz V, Alcaraz P, Pe´rez Flores D, Parrilla P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using prosthesis. Hernia. 2001;5:148-52.

Al-Nozha MM, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, et al. Obesity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2005;26(5):824-9.

Hamilton CJ, Jaroudi KA, Sieck UV. High prevalence of obesity in a Saudi infertility population. Ann Saudi Med. 1995;15:344-6.

Madani KA. Obesity in Saudi Arabia. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2000;22(3):113-8.

Kavic SM. Laparoscopic versus open repair: a superior approach to inguinal herniorrhaphy? OA Min Inv Surg. 2013;1(1):1.

Stoker DL, Speigelhalter DJ, Singh R, Wellwood JM. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. The Lancet. 1994;343(8908):1243-5.

Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJE, Praseedom RK. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):4-11.

Fegade S. Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia. World J Laparo Surg. 2008;1(1):41-8.

Liem MS, Van Der Graaf Y, Van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, et al. Comparision of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(22):1541-7.

Perko Z, Rakic M, Pogorelic Z, Družijanic N, Kraljevic J. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a five-year experience at a single center. Surg Today. 2011;41(2):216-21.

Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc Other Interven Tech. 2005;19:188-99.

Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1479-92.

Kulacoglu H. Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients. Hippokratia. 2011;15(3):223-31.

Faisal MF, Islam KM, Khan MH, Biswas AK, Azad MA, Reza MN. Early clinical outcomes following laparoscopic vs. open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. KYAMC J. 2019;10(2):85-9.

Singh V, De U. Laparoscopic mesh versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. an experience from West Bengal, India. The Int J Surg. 2008:20(1):84-90.

Koshariya M, Soni M, Malpani P, Parmar B, Shukla S. A comparative study between open and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Int Surg J. 2019;6:3353-8.

Gupta DK. Inguinal hernia in children: An Indian experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 1993;8:466-8.

Charles NR. A two-year retrospective study of congenital inguinal hernia at Western Regional Hospital Nepal. J Nep Med Assoc. 2000;39:172-5.

Helmy AM, Aldardeer AA, Redwaan AA. Prospective trial comparing open approach of Lichtenstein tension-free mesh with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for repair of inguinal hernia, tertiary center experience. Int Surg J. 2019;6:3927-31.

Garg P, Pai A, Vijaykumar H. Comparison of early postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Int Surg J. 2018;5:2732-6.

Koju R, Bhakta RK, Malla B, Dongol Y, Thapa LB. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal mesh repair versus lichtenstein’s hernioplasty. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017;15(36):135-40.

Shah HA. A comparative study between laparoscopic hernia repair and open lichtenstein mesh repair. BJMMR. 2017;21(9):1-8.

Jaykar RD. Prospective comparative study of open meshplasty (lichentenstein’s method) versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Int Med J. 2014;1:9.

McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD001785

Downloads

Published

2019-12-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles