A comparative study of inguinal hernia using monofilament non-absorbable suture versus monofilament absorbable suture in Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair at tertiary care government hospital

Authors

  • Karan R. Patel Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
  • Adeesh P. Jain Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
  • Sarav C. Shah Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
  • Rahul Rathwa Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
  • Kirtan Gosai Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195395

Keywords:

Inguinal hernia, Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty, Absorbable suture, Non-absorbable suture, Chronic groin pain

Abstract

Background: The surgical treatment of inguinal hernias has evolved through several stage, history of groin hernia is the history of surgery itself. But, chronic pain is still a major irritating post-operative complain of the patient. The objective of the present study was to compare post-operative outcomes of mesh fixation with monofilament non-absorbable v/s monofilament absorbable suture material in terms of postoperative pain, chronic groin pain, seroma formation, wound infection, scrotal oedema and recurrence in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

Methods: This is a single center, prospective randomized controlled study of 152 cases of inguinal hernia comparing post-operative outcomes of mesh fixation with monofilament non-absorbable v/s monofilament absorbable suture material in Lichtenstein hernioplasty at Baroda Medical College and S.S.G. Hospital, between 1st November 2017 to 30th November 2018.

Results: Total 152 patients of unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia were studied 76 in each group. Chronic groin pain mean visual analogue scale score at 3 months was higher in group with non-absorbable suture compared to monofilament absorbable group (1.3±0.9 v/s 0.95±0.8 p value <0.05).

Conclusions: Monofilament absorbable suture is associated with less chronic groin pain and compared to monofilament non-absorbable sutures.

Author Biography

Karan R. Patel, Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India

Senior Resident, Department of Surgery

References

Igor J, Wiser I, Karasic E, Nesterenko V, Poluksht N, Lavy R, et al. Reduced pain after tension free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single blind randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:102-7.

Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, Cheung FK, Wong CM, Ma TH. Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244:27-33.

Aasvang E, Kehlet H. Surgical management of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:795-801.

Meena LN, Bansal S, Verma P, Rai R. A comparative study of postoperative chronic pain after tension free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable versus non absorbable sutures for mesh fixation. Int Surg J. 2018;5(4):1378-81.

Paajanen H, Kossi J, Silvasti S, Hulmi T, Hakala T. Randomized clinical trial of tissue glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in local anaesthetic Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1245-51.

Lionetti R, Neola B, Dilillo S, Bruzzese D, Ferulano GP. Sutureless hernioplasty with light-weight mesh and fibrin glue versus Lichtenstein procedure: a comparison of outcomes focusing on chronic postoperative pain. Hernia. 2012;16:127-31.

Smedberg SG, Broome AE, Gulmo A. Ligation of the hernia sac? Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64(2):299-306.

Wagner J, Brunicardi F, Amid P, Chen D. Inguinal hernias. In: Schwartz S, Brunicardi F, Andersen D, Billiar T, Dunn D, Hunter J, eds. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015: 1495-1516.

Abramson JH, Gofin J, Hopp C, Makler A, Epstein LM. The epidemiology of inguinal hernia. A survey in western Jerusalem. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978;32:59.

Abrahamson J. Etiology and pathophysiology of primary and recurrent groin hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78(6):953-72.

Kharadi A, Shah V. Comparative study of mesh fixation with non-absorbable v/s delayed absorbable suture in open inguinal hernia. Int Surg J. 2016;3(3):1180-3.

Shanoo A, Sanjeev C, Zeeshan A, Ashish M, Amit G, Jeevan K, et al. Comparative study between monofilament absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein’s hernia repair. The Antiseptic. 2017;114:27-31.

Paajanen H. Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy?. Hernia. 2002;6:26-8.

Kim-Fuchs C, Angst E, Vorburger S, Helbling C, Candinas D, Schlumpf R. Prospective randomized trial comparing sutured with sutureless mesh fixation for Lichtenstein hernia repair: long-term results. Hernia. 2012;16:21-7.

Pierides G, Scheinin T, Remes V, Hermunen K, Vironen J. Randomized comparison of self-fixating and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:630-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles