DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190827

Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scoring in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and validation of RIPASA scoring

Jeevan G. Sanjive, Ravi H. Ramaiah

Abstract


Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. A delay in performing an appendicectomy in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy increases the risk of appendicular perforation and sepsis. We prospectively compared and validated RIPASA to Alvarado scoring system when applied to an Indian population.

Methods: This study included all the patients presented in General Surgery and The Emergency Department of Manipal Hospital, Bangalore diagnosed to have acute appendicitis from October 2014 to March 2016. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, predicted negative appendicectomy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the RIPASA and Alvarado scoring system were derived using SPSS statistical software.

Results: 75 patients were included in the study. Using the RIPASA scoring system, 97.1% of patients who actually had acute appendicitis were correctly diagnosed, compared to only 52.85% when using the Alvarado scoring system. The sensitivity and the specificity of the RIPASA scoring system is 97.14% and 60% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA scoring system is 94.67% and that of Alvarado scoring system is 52%. The results indicate that the RIPASA scoring system is a better diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (p<0.001).

Conclusions: It is observed that the RIPASA scoring system has higher sensitivity and higher specificity compared to Alvarado scoring. It also has higher diagnostic accuracy and consequently, it has low negative appendicectomy rate. It can be concluded that the RIPASA scoring can be effectively conducted for the better evaluation of acute appendicitis.


Keywords


Acute appendicitis, Alvarado score, RIPASA Score

Full Text:

PDF

References


Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med. 1999;63:137-40.

Cuscheri A. The small intestine and vermiform appendix. In: Cuschieri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR, eds. Essential Surgical Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinermann, 1995: 1297-1329.

Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg. 1992;58:264-9.

Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:418-9.

Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:220-5.

Wani MM, Yousaf MN, Khan MA, Baba Abdul A, Durrani M, Wani M, et al. Usefulness of the Alvarado scoring system with respect to age, sex and time of presentation, with regression analysis of individual parameters. Internet J Surg. 2007;11(2):1-5.

Chong CF. Evaluation of the RIPASA Score: a new scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int Med J. 2010;6(1):17-26.

Gilmore OJ, Browett JP, Griffin PH, et al. Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study. Lancet. 1975;2:421-4.

Antel J, Rivera L, Landenberg B, Halm G, Fatava MA, Brown CVR Clinical diagnostic pathway for acute Appendicitis: prospective Validation JAM Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):849-56.

Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of non-perforated and perforated appendicitis; implications for pathophysiology and management. Annsurg. 2007;245:886-92.