DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190398

Comparative study of polyester vs polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Akshay D. Sutaria, Amul N. Bhedi, Minesh L. Sindhal, Arnab A. Sarkar

Abstract


Background: Despite of convincing advantages offered by meshes, their use in hernia surgery remains controversial due to their long-term effects. A lighter and softer mesh may decrease chronic pain and recurrence by creating less fibrosis in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: This study was conducted with an aim to evaluate the incidence of chronic groin pain and recurrence in polyester mesh and polypropylene mesh groups of patients in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. 40 patients with simple uncomplicated inguinal hernia subjected to TEP hernioplasty using either Polyester mesh or Polypropylene mesh after being randomized into two groups over a period of one year at Department of General Surgery at SSG Hospital, Baroda. Operative data were recorded, and the patients were followed-up accordingly. Independent assessors were assigned to obtain incidence of chronic groin pain and recurrence and other secondary outcomes.

Results: Chronic pain, post-operative pain scores, duration of hospital stay, early return to daily activity, and feeling of lump were significantly lower with polyester mesh as compared to Polypropylene mesh. However, there was no significant difference in both the groups with respect to recurrence and post-operative complications.

Conclusions: A polyester mesh has better long-term outcomes for chronic pain, post-operative pain scores, duration of hospital stay, early return to daily activity, and feeling of lump compared with a polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Keywords


Inguinal hernia, Mesh, Laparoscopy, Polypropylene, Polyester, TEP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sakorafas GH, Halikias I, Nissotakis C, Kotsifopoulos N, Stavrou A, Antonopoulos C, et al. Open tension free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique. BMC Surgery. 2001 Dec;1(1):3.

Memon M, Cooper N, Memon B, Memon M, Abrams K. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1479-92.

Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):142-7.

Köckerling F, Bittner R, Jacob DA, Seidelmann L, Keller T, Adolf D, et al. TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endoscopy. 2015 Dec 1;29(12):3750-60.

Bansal VK, Misra MC, Babu D, Victor J, Kumar S, Sagar R, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endoscopy. 2013 Jul 1;27(7):2373-82.

Chatzimavroudis G, Koutelidakis I, Papaziogas B, Tsaganos T, Koutoukas P, Giamarellos-Bourboulis E, et al. The effect of the type of intraperitoneally implanted prosthetic mesh on the systemic inflammatory response. Hernia. 2008 Jun 1;12(3):277-83.

EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):322.

Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Öttinger A et al. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg. 2003;164(12):951-960.

Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M. Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1994 May 1;379(3):168-71.

Langenbach M, Schmidt J, Zirngibl H. Comparison of biomaterials: three meshes and TAPP for inguinal hernia. Surg Endoscopy. 2006;20(10):1511-7.

Heikkinen T, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Bringman S. Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias. Hernia. 2005;10(1):34-40.

Stoppa R, Rives J, Warlaumont C, Palot J, Verhaeghe P, Delattre J. The use of dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North America. 1984;64(2):269-85.

Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D. Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2004;91(1):44-8.

Riepe G, Loos J, Imig H, Schröder A, Schneider E, Petermann J, et al. Long-term in vivo alterations of polyester vascular grafts in humans. European J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997 Jun 1;13(6):540-8.

Shah BC, Goede MR, Bayer R, Buettner SL, Putney SJ, McBride CL, et al. Does type of mesh used have an impact on outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia?. Am J Surg. 2009 Dec 1;198(6):759-64.

Langenbach MR, Sauerland S. Polypropylene versus polyester mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: short-term results of a comparative study. Surgical Sci. 2013 Jan 23;4(01):29-34.

Mughal MA, Ahmed M, Sajid MT, Shukr I. Comparison of post-operative wound infection after inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh and polyester mesh. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2012 Dec 1(4):49.

Prakash P, Bansal VK, Misra MC, Babu D, Sagar R, Krishna A, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing chronic groin pain and quality of life in lightweight versus heavyweight polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Minimal Access Surgery. 2016 Apr;12(2):154.

Morrison Jr JE, Jacobs VR. Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using preformed polyester mesh without fixation: prospective study with 1-year follow-up results in a rural setting. Surg Laparoscopy Endoscopy Percutaneous Tech. 2008 Feb 1;18(1):33-9.

Oleynikov D, Goede M. Polyester, Polypropylene, ePTFE for Inguinal Hernias: Does It Really Matter?. InThe SAGES Manual of Hernia Repair 2013:231-9.