DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185032

Observational study of appropriateness of colonoscopy using appropriateness criteria designed by EPAGE

Bhushan R. Kale, Sandhya Iyer, Prabhakar Subramanian

Abstract


Background: To evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy for various common indications observed in day to day outpatient and inpatient general surgical practice as per criteria devised by expert panel of EPAGE 2.

Methods: Appropriateness score for indication of colonoscopy was calculated from EPAGE official website and the colonoscopy findings were verified against appropriateness score. The effect of various parameters like age, sex, duration of symptoms and referring doctor individually on both EPAGE score as well as colonoscopy results was verified.

Results: In our study, we found that only age of patient statistically affects EPAGE score. We also found that there is correlation between EPAGE score and colonoscopy results.

Conclusions: As age of patient increases likelihood of getting a significant EPAGE score increases while other parameters like sex, duration of symptoms, referring physicians did not affect EPAGE score in our study. The probability of getting positive findings on colonoscopy increases if the indication of colonoscopy is proved appropriate by EPAGE. All other parameters did not affect the colonoscopy findings in our study.


Keywords


Appropriateness, Colonoscopy, Endoscopy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary 32rd edition © W.B saunders company; 2012:387.

Marzo-Castillejo M, Almeda J, Mascort J. Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests according to EPAGE-II in the Spanish region of Catalonia. BMC Family Practice. 2015;16:154.

Vader JP, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, et al. European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy (epage): conclusion and www site. endoscopy. 1999;31(8):687-94.

Wolff WI. Colonoscopy: history and development. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84(9):1017-25.

Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB. Results from the American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy/ U.S. food and drug administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(4):421-7.

ASGE guidelines for clinical application. Establishment of gastrointestinal endoscopy areas. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(6):910-2.

Vader JP, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, et al. European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): conclusion and WWW site. Endoscopy. 1999;31(08):687-94.

Harris JK, Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader JP. The appropriateness of colonoscopy: a multicenter, International, observational Study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(3):150-7.

Gimeno García AZ, González Y, Quintero E, Nicolás-Pérez D, Adrián Z, Romero R, et al. Clinical validation of the european panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy (epage) ii criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2012;44(1):32-7.

Fernández-Esparrach G, Gimeno-García AZ, Llach J, Pellisé M, Ginès A, et al. [Guidelines for the rational use of endoscopy to improve the detection of relevant lesions in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study]. Med Clin (Barc). 2007;7;129(6):205-8.

Gonvers JJ, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader JP, Froehlich F. EPAGE Study Group. A European view of diagnostic yield and appropriateness of colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54(75):729-35.

Minoli G, Meucci G, Bortoli A, Garripoli A, Gullotta R, Leo P, et al. The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52(1):39-44.

Mahajan RJ, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy. How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996;14;156(18):2065-9.

Chan YM, Goh KL. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of EGD: a prospective study in a large Asian hospital. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(4):517-24.

Sánchez-del Río A, Quintero E, Alarcón O. [Appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in open-access endoscopy units]. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Mar;27(3):119-24.

De Bosset V, Froehlich F, Rey JP, Thorens J, Schneider C, Wietlisbach V, et al. Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy? Endoscopy. 2002;34(5):360-8.

Balaguer F, Llach J, Castells A, Bordas JM, Ppellisé M, Rodríguez-Moranta F, et al. The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(5):609-13.

Coriat R, Pommaret E, Chryssostalis A, Viennot S, Gaudric M, Brezault C, et al. Quality control of colonoscopy procedures: a prospective validated method for the evaluation of professional practices applicable to all endoscopic units. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009 Feb;33(2):103-8.

Tan YM, Goh KL. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a university hospital. Med J Malaysia. 2004;59(1):34-8.