DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185048

Attachment of a pressure gradient chamber to existing lumbar theco-peritoneal shunt in a patient with pseudotumor cerebri with low pressure headaches, a novel procedure: a case report

Aditendraditya S. Bhati, Aarjun Tyagi, Sudheer K. Tyagi

Abstract


Pesudotumor cerebri is a syndrome which causes intracranial hypertension with no associated mass lesion. It is managed both medically as well as surgically. Cerebral spinal fluid diversion using theco-peritoneal shunt is commonly performed to decrease intracranial tension. We present a case of a middle age lady who had severe low pressure headaches following theco-peritoneal shunt for pesudotumor cerebri. She was managed by attaching pressure gradient chamber to the pre-existing theco-peritoneal shunt. Patient had marked improvement in headache, which gradually subsided. Attaching pressure gradient chamber to the pre-existing theco-peritoneal shunt helps to improve low pressures headaches in pseudotumor cerebri. It is an alternative procedure considering other extensive surgical options.


Keywords


Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, Programmable chamber, Pressure gradient chamber, Pseudotumor cerebri, Thecoperitoneal shunt

Full Text:

PDF

References


Quincke H. Meningitis serosa. Sammlung Klinischer Vortr├Ąge. 1893;67:655.

Durcan FJ, Corbett JJ, Wall M. The incidence of pseudotumor cerebri. Population studies in Iowa and Louisiana. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:875.

Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Cross SA, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Descriptive epidemiology in Rochester, Minn, 1976 to 1990. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:78.

Yadav YR, Pande S, Raina VK, Singh M. Lumboperitoneal shunts: Review of 409 cases. Neurol India. 2004;52:188-90.

Corbett JJ, Thompson HS. The rational management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:1049-51.

Gallia GL, Rigamonti D, Williams MA. The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:375-81.

Aschoff A, Kremer P, Hashemi B, Kunze S. The scientific history of hydrocephalus and its treatment. Neurosurg Rev. 1999;22:67-93.

Eisenberg HM, Davidson RI, Shillito J, Jr. Lumboperitoneal shunts. Review of 34 cases. J Neurosurg. 1997;35:427-31.

Chiewvit S, Nuntaaree S, Kanchaanapiboon P, Chiewvit P. Assessment lumboperitoneal or ventriculoperitoneal shunt patency by radionuclide technique: a review experience cases. World J Nucl Med. 2014;13:75-84.

Wang VY, Barbaro NM, Lawton MT, Pitts L, Kunwar S, Parsa AT, et al. Complications of lumboperitoneal shunts. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:1045-8.

Bloch O, McDermott MW. Lumboperitoneal shunts for the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:1107-11.

Kang S. Efficacy of lumbo-peritoneal versus ventriculo-peritoneal shunting for management of chronic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142:45-9.

Nadkarni TD, Rekate HL, Wallace D. Concurrent use of a lumboperitoneal shunt with programmable valve and ventricular access device in the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri: review of 40 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2:19-24.