Assessment of effect of various concentration of ketamine-propofol (ketofol) on haemodynamic parameters and LMA insertion conditions

Authors

  • Sunita Jain Department of Anesthesiology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, District Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Raju Singh Rathore Department of Anesthesiology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, District Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Ashfaq Modiwala Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, District Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183736

Keywords:

Ketamine, Ketofol, LMA insertion, Propofol

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of various concentration of ketamine-propofol (ketofol) on LMA insertion condition and hemodynamic parameters.

Methods: Hundred patients of ASA I, II, aged between 18-65 years, were randomized in group A, B, C and D, each consist of 26, 25, 25, 24 patients respectively. They were premedicated with injection GPL, injection midazolam, injection fentanyl and induced with ketofol in 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4 ratio in Group A, B, C, D respectively. 60 seconds after induction LMA insertion condition including mouth opening, swallowing, coughing, head and body movements, laryngospasm, ease of LMA insertion, apnea time, and time of LMA insertion were recorded. They were scored 1 to 3. Hemodynamic parameters- heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure and SPO2 were recorded before induction (T1), immediately following induction (T2), immediately after LMA insertion (T3), 5mins after LMA insertion (T4) and 10 mins after LMA insertion (T5).

Results: Total 100 patients were included in this prospective randomized double-blind study between April 2017 to March 2018. Pulse rate at (T3) was significantly lower (P-0.06) in group C and D. Diastolic BP was found lower at (T2) time (P-0.04) in group C and D. Apnea time was longest in group A (P-0.002) LMA insertion time was minimum in group B (P-0.008).

Conclusions: Addition of low dose of ketamine in propofol favour LMA insertion, due to opposite effect on muscle tone, better relaxation but heart rate, blood pressure remains stable with 1:1, 1:2 ratio of ketofol.

 

References

Ketofol. D simmers, commentator: H Moodliar moderator: S Govender. Discipline of Anasthetics. 8 Feb 2013;No. 5. Available at:

http://anaesthetics.ukzn.ac.za/libraries/documents2011/dale_simmers_-_ketofol.sflb.ashx

Arora S. Combining ketamine and propofol (“ketofol”) for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a review. Western J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):20.

Rapeport DA, Martyr JW, Wang LP. The use of “ketofol” (ketamine – propofol admixture) infusion in conjunction with regional anaesthaesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(1):121-3.

Handa-Tsutsui F, Kodaka M. Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion. J Clinical Anesthes. 2005 Aug 1;17(5):344-7.

Hug JC, McLeskey CH, Nahrwold ML, Roizen MF, Stanley TH, Thisted RA, et al. Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients. Anesthes Analges. 1993 Oct;77(4 Suppl):S21-9.

Larsen R, Rathgeber J, Bagdahn A, Lange H, Rieke H. Effect of propofol on cardiovascular Dynamics and coronary blood flow in geriatric patients. Anesthesia. 1998; 43(suppl) 25-31.

Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, Kikura M, Doi M, Ikeda T, et al. Comparison of the effect-site keOs of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients. Anesthesiol: J Am Soc Anesthesiolog. 1999 Jun 1;90(6):1517-27.

Gray C, Swinhoe CF, Myint Y, Mason D. Target controlled infusion of ketamine as analgesia for TIVA with propofol. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:957-61.

Guit JB, Koning HM, Coster ML, Niemeijer RP, Mackie DP. Ketamine as analgesic for total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. Anesthesia. 1991;46:24-7.

Ozgul U, Begec Z, Karahan K, Erdogan MA, Aydogan MS, Colak C, et al. Comparison of propofol and ketamine-propofol mixture (Ketofol) on laryngeal tube-suction II conditions and hemodynamics: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. Current Therap Res. 2013 Dec 1;75:39-43.

Claeys MA, Gepts E, Camu F. Hemodynamic changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with Propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1988;60:3-9.

Cheam EW, Chui PT. Randomized double blind comparison of fentanyl, mivacurium, or placebo to facilitate laryngeal mask airway insertion. J Anaesthes. 2000;55:32332-6.

Esa K, Azarinah I, Muhammad M. A comparison between laryngeal tube suction II airway and proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic surgery. Med J Malaysia. 2011;66:182-6.

Frizelle HP, Duranteau J, Samii K. A comparison of propofol with propofol – ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg. 1997;84:1318-22.

Tomatir E, Atalay H, Gurses E. Effects of low dose Ketamine before induction on propofol anaesthesia for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004,14;845-50.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles