Published: 2018-07-24

Evaluation of a new technique for abdominal wall closure in midline laparotomies

Moharam Abdelsamie Mohamed Abd El Shahid, Fawzy Abo Bakre Mahmoud, A. Said Elmallah


Background: An efficient technique for abdominal wall closure should provide strength and be a barrier against infection. Method of closure and type of suture material are critical aspects of an effective abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy. Dehiscence of abdominal wounds after closure is a serious complication especially in emergency laparotomies. Our study was done to know whether our method of abdominal closure was helpful in reducing incidence of wound dehiscence.

Methods: Present study was carried out as a retrospective randomized clinical study in the department of general surgery, Menoufia University Hospitals for one year starting from March 2017 to March 2018. 168 patients had midline laparotomies (either elective or emergent) for inflammatory, traumatic or neoplastic indications.

Results: In present study for this new technique of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomies, wound infection was noticed in 12/168 (7.2%) cases and 2/168 (1.2%) patients developed wound dehiscence.

Conclusions: Present study demonstrates that our new technique (Moharam Repair) of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomies) is efficient in reducing post-operative wound dehiscence (burst abdomen). So, this technique is applicable, safe, and can minimize morbidities and mortalities related to wound dehiscence (as a short-term complication) after midline exploratory laparotomies (MEL).


Midline laparotomies, Moharam repair, Wound dehiscence

Full Text:



Gandhi JA, Shinde PH, Digarse RD. Evaluation of abdominal wall closure technique in emergency laparotomies at a tertiary care hospital. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):1796-801.

Harries RL, Cornish J, Bosanquet D, Rees B, Horwood J, Islam S, et al. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)-abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Br Med J Open. 2017;7(12):e017235.

Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1-24.

Hughes BR, Webster D. Leslie Ernest Hughes. BMJ: Br Med J (Online). 2011;343: :d7367.

Shukla VK, Gupta A, Singh H, Pandey M, Gautam A. Cardiff repair of incisional hernia: a university hospital experience. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(4):271-4.

Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, Van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254-60.

Millbourn D. Closure of Midline Abdominal Incisions with Small Stitches. Studies on Wound Complications and Health Economy Doctoral thesis. Umea, Sweden: Umea University.2012.

Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2012;397(8):1201-7.

Williams ZF, Hope WW. Abdominal wound closure: current perspectives. Open Access Surg. 2015;2015(1):89-94.

Rath AM, Chevrel JP. The healing of laparotomies: review of the literature. Hernia. 1998;2(3):145-9.

Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Baig MK, McFall MR. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy. Int J Surgery. 2011;9(8):615-25.

Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the Best Abdominal Closure-An Evidence-Based Overview of the Literature. In Recurrent Hernia. 2007:117-122. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, B├╝chler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg.;251:843-56.

Gandhi JA, Shinde PH, Digarse RD. Evaluation of abdominal wall closure technique in emergency laparotomies at a tertiary care hospital. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):1796-801.