DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181100

Clinical significance of the buccal fat pad: how to determine the correct surgical indications based on preoperative analysis

Mauro Tarallo, Nefer Fallico, Francesca Maccioni, Davide Bencardino, Cristiano Monarca, Diego Ribuffo, Giuseppe Di Taranto

Abstract


Background: Despite the multitude of clinical and aesthetic uses, the correct surgical indications for buccal fat pad (BFP) removal have yet to be fully elucidated. Although the procedure is widely performed and promoted for aesthetic purpose, literature lacks of studies accounting for a proper evaluation of patients undergoing BFP removal.

Methods: Between 2012 and 2016 patients seeking an improvement of the malar contour by reduction of the submalar prominence have been visited at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Institution. A preoperative MRI was requested in order to correctly identify the volume of the BFP and the presence of a masseter muscle (MM) hypertrophy.

Results: According to clinical examination and the results of the preoperative imaging, patients were offered different treatment options: patients with BFP hypertrophy underwent BFP removal through an itraoral approach; patients with MM hypertrophy received injection of 50 UI of botulinum toxin (BTX). No complications were observed in the postoperative period and all patients were satisfied with the results.

Conclusions: According to the experience, midface contouring procedures should take account of both surgeons’ experience, patients’ expectations and anatomical evaluation. As such, there is no given approach suitable for all cases. Suggested visual criteria, clinical examination and imaging analysis are useful in establishing patient’s condition and determining the appropriate methods of treatment to enhance the facial profile.


Keywords


Buccal fat pad, Bichat fat pad, Buccal fat pad removal, Masseter muscle, Masseter muscle hypertrophy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kahn JL, Sick H, Laude M, Koritke JG. The buccal adipose body (Bichat's fat-pad). Morphological study. Acta Anat (Basel). 1988;132(1):41-7.

Kahn JL, Wolfram-Gabel R, Bourjat P. Anatomy and imaging of the deep fat of the face. Clin Anat. 2000;13(5):373-82.

Egyedi P. Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oro-antral and/or oro-nasal communications. J Maxillofac Surg. 1977;5(4):241-4.

Jackson IT. Buccal fat pad removal. Aesthet Surg J. 2003;23(6):484-5.

Jackson IT. Anatomy of the buccal fat pad and its clinical significance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(7):2059-60; discussion 61-3.

Smyth AG. Botulinum toxin treatment of bilateral masseteric hypertrophy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Feb;32(1):29-33.

Wu WT. Botox facial slimming/facial sculpting: the role of botulinum toxin-A in the treatment of hypertrophic masseteric muscle and parotid enlargement to narrow the lower facial width. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;18(1):133-40.

Park MY, Ahn KY, Jung DS. Botulinum toxin type A treatment for contouring of the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(5):477-83.

Matarasso A. Buccal fat pad excision: aesthetic improvement of the midface. Ann Plast Surg. 1991 May;26(5):413-8.

Newman J. Removal of buccal fat pad by liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Aug;86(2):385-6.

Cohen SR, Fireman E, Hewett S, Saad A. Buccal Fat Pad Augmentation for Facial Rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(6):1273e-6e.