DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181130

A comparative study of single layer closure versus conventional layered closure of laparotomy wounds

Akash Bande, Divish Saxena, Prabhat B. Nichkaode, Murtaza Akhtar

Abstract


Background: The goal of wound closure after laparotomy is to restore the function of the abdominal wall. The techniques for closure of anterior abdominal wall includes either layered closure, modified Smead-Jones technique, mass closure or retention suture or combination of above mentioned techniques. The studies which compared the continuous and interrupted suture techniques have concluded that enmass continuous sutures have an advantage of holding the fascia together. The present study tries to compare the two techniques i.e. single layer closure (mass closure) and layered closure in patients undergoing laparotomy by midline incision in tertiary care hospital.

Methods: 97 patients undergoing either emergency or elective midline laparotomy were included in the study, where in 64 patients laparotomy closure was done in single layer using polypropylene 1-0 and in 33 patients by layered closure where peritoneum was closed with polygalactin 2-0 and linea alba by polypropylene 1-0. Patients were allocated two groups as per convenience of operating surgeon without using any method of randomization.

Results: The single layer closure technique required statistically significant less closure time of 18.2±3.2 minutes as compared to conventional layered closure 26.4±4 minutes time of (p <0.001). Also, the incidence of postoperative complications was found to be comparatively less (17.18%) in single layer closure group as compared to complications (42.42%) in layered closure group.

Conclusions: Single layer closure technique continues to be better than conventional layered closure technique of laparotomy wounds in terms of operative time and post-operative complications.


Keywords


Enmass closure, Laparotomy wounds, Layered closure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sanders RJ, DiClemente D, Ireland K: Principles of abdominal wound closure: Animal studies. Arch Surg 1977;112:1184.

Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Current Surg. 2005;62(2):220-5.

Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J. 1982;284:931-3.

Domball FT, Hill GL, Horrocks JC. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds. Br J Surg. 2005;62:823-9.

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97-132.

Singh A, Singh S, Dhaliwal US, Singh S. Technique of abdominal wall closure: a comparative study. Ind J Surg. 1981;43:785.

Banerjee SR, Daoud I, Russell JC. Abdominal wound dehiscence. Curr Surg. 1983;40:432.

Banerjee P, Chatterjee A. Critical evaluation of conventional abdominal closure with single layer closure in adult and elderly. J. Indian Med Assoc. 1989;87(12):277-8.

Sreeharsha MV. A comparative study of single layer closure and conventional layered closure of laparotomy wounds. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(40):7695-709.

Jones TE, Newell ET Jr, Brubaker RE. The use of alloy steel wire in the closure of abdominal wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1941;72:1056-9.

Whipple AO. The critical latent or lag period in the healing of wounds. Ann Surg. 1940;112:481.

Kirk RM. Effect of method of opening and closing the abdomen on incidence of wound bursting. Lancet. 1972;19:352-3.

Weiland DE, Bay BC, Sordi DS. Choosing the best abdominal closure by metaanalysis. Am J Surg. 1998;17(6):666-9.

Togart RE. The suturing of abdominal incisions. Ar J Surg. 1967;54:124-7.

Shukla HS, Kumar S, Mishra MC, Naithan YP. Burst abdomen and suture material: a comparison of abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and chromic catgut. Ind J Surg. 1981;43:487-91.

Chowdhury SK, Choudhury JD. Mass closure versus layered closure of abdominal wound. J Ind Med Assoc. 1994;92(7):229-32.

Singh G, Ahluwalia R. A comparison between mass closure and layered closure of midline abdominal incisions. Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2012;5(1):23.

Chalya PL, Massinde AN, Kihunrwa A, Mabula JB. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):281.

Ellis H, Abrahamson J. Maingot’s abdominal operations. 10th ed. United States of America: Prentice Hall International; 1997:395-557.