Intra-incisional versus intravenous route of antibiotic administration in preventing surgical site infections: a randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • Aditya N. Patil Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
  • Veerendra M. Uppin Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181126

Keywords:

Appendicectomy, Antibiotics, Intraincisional, Intravenous, Surgical site infection

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Whilst the use of prophylactic antibiotics has been shown to reduce postoperative wound infection, controversy still remains as to the optimum route of administration and the duration of treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a preoperative single dose of a cephalosporin antibiotic (cefotaxime) administered intraincisionally versus that administered intravenously, in preventing postoperative surgical site infections following appendicectomy.

Methods: Sixty consecutive cases diagnosed as uncomplicated appendicitis who consented for open appendicectomy at a tertiary care institute were included in the study. Cases were randomized to 2 comparable groups of 30 patients each. Preoperatively, patients in Group A received a single dose of Inj. Cefotaxime 1g intraincisionally while those in Group B received the same intravenously. Incision sites were examined every alternative day starting on postoperative day 3 until removal of sutures. Signs of surgical site infection, if any, were recorded and outcomes were statistically tested for significance.

Results: One patient in Group A (3.3%) and 4 patients in Group B (13.3%) showed signs of postoperative surgical site infection (p >0.05) during the follow up period which prolonged their hospital stay.

Conclusions: This study showed that a single dose preoperative intraincisional administration of cefotaxime was as effective as intravenous administration for prevention of postoperative surgical site infection after open appendicectomy. Although the difference was not statistically significant, there was a reduced incidence of SSI in individuals who received intraincisional antibiotic. These results are encouraging for a way forward in reducing unnecessary burdening of systemic antibiotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.

 

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am J Infect Control. 1996;24:380-8.

Daniel AA, Dellinger EP. Surgical infections and choice of antibiotics. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, (eds). Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 18th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008:229-306.

Foster GE, Bourke JB, Bolwell J, Doran J, Balfour TW, Holliday A, Hardcastle JD, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of wound sepsis after appendectomy and their modification by metronidazole or povidone-iodine. Lancet. 1981;4:769-71.

Moylan JA. The proper use of local antimicrobial agents in wounds. World J Surg. 1980;4:433-7.

Davidson AIG, Clark G, Smith G. Postoperative wound infection: a computer analysis. Br J Surg. 1971;58:333-7.

Scher KS, Peoples JB. Combined use of topical and systemic antibiotics. Am J Surg. 1991;161:422-5.

Matushek KJ, Rosin E. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin applied topically to the surgical wound. Arch Surg. 1991;126:890-3.

Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dunphy JE. Appendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg. 1975;110:677.

Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD001439.

National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470-85.

Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, Schutt DC, Jaques DP. Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg. 1997;225:252-61.

Koch A, Zippel R, Marusch F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis. Dig Surg. 2000;17:370-8.

Bennion RS, Thompson JE, Baron EJ, Finegold SM. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis with peritonitis: treatment and bacteriology. Clin Ther. 1990;12:31-44.

Browder W, Smith JW, Vivoda L, Nichols RL. Nonperformative appendicitis: a continuing surgical dilemma. J Infect Dis. 1989;159:1088-94.

Shubing W, Litian Z. Preventing infection of the incision after appendectomy by using metronidazole preoperativelyto infiltrate tissues at the incision. Am J Surg. 1997;174:422-4.

Taylor TV, Dawson DL, de Silva M, Shaw SJ, Durrans D, Makin D. Preoperative intraincisional cefamandole reduces wound infection and postoperative inpatient stay in upper abdominal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67:235-7.

Pollock AV, Evans M, Smith GM. Preincisional intraparietal Augmentin in abdominal operations. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989;71:97-100.

Griego RD, Zitelli JA. Intra-incisional prophylactic antibiotics for dermatologic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:688-92.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles