DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174878

Pilonidal sinus- limberg versus karidakis flap our experience at SIMS, Shivamogga

Madhusudhan A., Madhan D. P. Swamy, Mohhamad Arif

Abstract


Background: The etiology and pathogenesis of sacro-coccygeal pilonidal sinus are not clear. The pathogenesis of the disease is hypothesized to be related to the accumulation of weak and lifeless hair in the intergluteal region, which over time gives rise to foreign body reaction, causing abscess and sinus formation. A deep natal cleft with one of favourable factors enhance sacro-coccygeal pilonidal sinus, e.g., sweating, maceration, bacterial contamination and penetration of hairs. Obesity, trauma, local irritation and a sedentary lifestyle are usually associated with PS. Although pilonidal sinus can be treated using various conservative and surgical methods, recurrence rate remains high. Complete surgical removal of the pilonidal sinus or sinuses and appropriate reconstruction can lead to successful recovery. However, collection of the lifeless hair depends on the anatomy of the intergluteal area, and accompanying risk factors can lead to subsequent recurrence.

Methods: The objective of this study is to compare the immediate post-operative and long-term results of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap, which are being widely used now to treat pilonidal sinus disease. It was a retrospective observational study where the patients (total number of patients-30) who underwent both the procedures were compared, Limberg flap (LF; n = 13) and Karydakis flap (KF; n = 17).

Results: Present study found out that short and long-term results of the LF and KF procedures are similar. In present study we also noted that all patients with pilonidal sinus disease were men, and most of them had jobs which involved sitting for long durations. Poor hygiene and hirsutism however was not noted in most of the patients, and was not objectively assessed.

Conclusions: Both the techniques can be used safely and effectively in sacro coccygeal pilonidal sinus disease.


Keywords


Karidakis flap, Limberg flap, Pilonidal sinus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen-Mersh TG. Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg. 1990;77(2):123-32.

Al-Hassan HK, Francis IM, Neglen P. Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus?. Acta Chir Scand. 1990;156:695-9.

Muzi MG, Milito G, Cadeddu F, Nigro C, Andreoli F, Amabile D, et al. Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200(1):9-14.

Krand O, Yalt T, Berber I, Kara VM, Tellioglu G. Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision and bilateral gluteus maximus fascia advancing flap: result of 278 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1172-7.

Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200(3):318-27.

Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(4):491-8.

Karaca T, Yoldaş O, Bilgin BÇ, Ozer S, Yoldaş S, Karaca NG. Comparison of short-term results of modified Karydakis flap and modified Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus surgery. Int J Surg. 2012;10(10):601-6.

Arslan K. Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(1):29-37.

Aydede H, Erhan Y, Sakarya A, Kumkumoglu Y. Comparison of three methods in surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:362-4.

Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar K, Keksek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg. 2005;190(3):388-92.

Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, Papp C. Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. Surg. 1997;121(3):258-63.

Akin M, Leventoglu S, Mentes BB, Bostanci H, Gokbayir H, Kilic K, et al. Comparison of the classic Limberg flap and modified Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective analysis of 416 patients. Surg Today. 2010;40(8):757-62.

Gurer A, Gomceli I, Ozdogan M, Ozlem N, Sozen S, Aydin R. Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Karydakis flap operation? A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(9):1797-9.

Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E, Akin M, Oguz M. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today. 2004;34(5):419-23.

Mentes O, Bagci M, Bilgin T, Coskun I, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M. Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision and primary closure: Result of 493 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;49(1):104-8.

Ersoy E, Devay AO, Aktimur R, Doganay B, Ozdoğan M, Gündoğdu RH. Comparison of the short-term results after Limberg and Karydakis procedures for pilonidal disease: randomized prospective analysis of 100 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(7):705-10.

Bernard Rosner. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th Edition, Duxbury; 2000:80-240.

Robert H Riffenburg. Statistics in Medicine, second edition, Academic press. 2005:85-125.

Sunder Rao PSS, Richard J. An Introduction to Biostatistics, A manual for students in health sciences, New Delhi: Prentice hall of India. 4th edition, 2006:86-160.

Suresh KP, Chandrasekhar S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. Journal Human Reproduction Science. 2012;5(1):7-13.

Corman ML. Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1989:297-304.

Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the result of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(11):1458-62.

Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD006213.

Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg. 1992;62(5):385-9.