Abdominal tuberculosis: a clinical study in a tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Jawahar Krishnaswamy Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Khalilur Rahaman Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Reshma S. Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Bharath N. Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174509

Keywords:

Abdominal tuberculosis, Abdominal pain, Gastrointestinal, Radiological investigations

Abstract

Background: Abdominal tuberculosis is the sixth most common form of extrapulmonary site of infection after lymphatic, genitourinary, bone and joint, miliary and meningeal TB with a rising incidence in recent years. Tuberculosis can affect any part of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract including anus, peritoneum and hepato-biliary system. The clinical manifestations of abdominal tuberculosis are non-specific and mimic various GI disorders and cause delay in diagnosis and management. The aim of this study is to study the incidence of abdominal tuberculosis, percentage of acute presentation, to study and analyse clinical presentation, various diagnostic modalities, role of surgery and to evaluate the spectrum of surgeries done for abdominal tuberculosis

Methods: Study was done by analyzing 108 cases in our tertiary care hospital, Chennai, India, during the period of June 2015 to January 2016. All suspected and diagnosed cases of abdominal tuberculosis were included in the study. The relevant clinical information, laboratory results, microbiological and radiological investigations were recorded. Histopathological examination of all the resected or excised specimens was done to detect tuberculosis in all the cases.

Results: Out of 108 cases with abdominal tuberculosis, the average age of presentation was between 21 and 40 years with a slight male predominance (male:female = 1.1:1). Abdominal pain (92%) was the most common presenting symptom followed by anorexia (70%), loss of weight (70%), and intestinal obstruction (13%). 29 cases underwent surgical management. All patients were put on anti-tubercular treatment and majority showed good response to therapy.

Conclusions: Abdominal tuberculosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with vague GI symptoms. To diagnose abdominal tuberculosis, high degree of suspicion is needed, and its incidence being common in people with lower socioeconomic status. This study gives a basic outline of presentation, diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis in developing country.

 

References

Park K, editor. Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine. 19th ed. India: M/S Banarasidas Bhanot; 2007:768.

Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis: The Indian contribution. Ind J Gastroenterol. 1998;17:141-7.

Global tuberculosis control 2012. [Internet]: World Health Organization. (Online). http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/index.html Cited 2011 April 11.

Wadhwa N, Agarwal S, Mishra K. Reappraisal of abdominal tuberculosis. J Indian Med Assoc. 2004;102:31-2.

Marshall JB. Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:989-9.

Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 1998;74:459-67.

Das P, Shukla HS. Clinical diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Surg. 1976;63:941-6.

Bhansali SK. Abdominal tuberculosis: Experiences with 300 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1977;67:324-37.

Prakash A. Ulcero-constrictive of the bowel. Int Surg Tuberculosis.1978;63:23-9.

Peda Veerraju E. Abdominal tuberculosis. In: Satya Sri S, editor. Textbook of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Interprint; 1998:250-2.

Paustian FF, Marshall JB. Intestinal tuberculosis. In: Berk JE, editor. Bockus Gastroenterology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: 1985:2018-36.

Hoon JR, Dockerty MB, Pemberton J. Ileocaecal tuberculosis including a comparison of this disease with non-specific regional enterocolitis and noncaseous tuberculated enterocolitis. Int Abstr Surg. 1950;91:417-40.

Tandon HD, Prakash A. Pathology of intestinal tuberculosis and its distinction from Crohn's disease. Gut. 1972;13:260-9.

Prakash A, Tandon HD, Nirmala L, Wadhwa SN, Prakash O, Kapur M. Chronic ulcerative lesions of the bowel. Indian J Surg. 1970;32:1-14.

Bhansali SK, Sethna JR. Intestinal obstruction: a clinical analysis of 348 cases. Indian J Surg. 1970;32:57-70.

Tandon RK, Sarin SK, Bose SL, Berry M, Tandon BN. A clinico-radiological reappraisal of intestinal tuberculosis-changing profile? Gastroenterol Jpn. 1986;21:17-22.

Talwar S, Talwar R, Prasad P. Tuberculous perforations of the small intestine. Int J Clin Pract. 1999;53:514-8.

Yoon HJ, Song YG, Park IW, Choi JP, Chang KH, Kim JM. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45:453-61.

David H Alpers, Laine L. Chronic infectious diseases of the small intestine. In: Tadataka Yamada Ed, Textbook of Gastroenterology, Vol 2 , 3rd Ed. Lippincott; 1999:73;1650- 53.

Pujari BD. Modified surgical procedures in intestinal tuberculosis. Br J Surgery. 1979:66:180-1.

Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:305-15.

Arif AU, Shah LA, Ullah A, Sadiq Mu D. The frequency and management of intestinal tuberculosis; a hospital based study. J Postgrad Med Instit. 2008;22(2):152-6.

Rajput MJ, Memon AS, Rani S, Memon AH. Clinicopathological profile and surgical management outcomes in patients suffering from intestinal tuberculosis. JLUMHS. 2005;4:113-8.

Underwood MJ, Thompson MM, Sayers RD, Hall AW. Presentation of abdominal tuberculosis to general surgeons. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1077-9.

Zuber PL, McKenna MT, Binkin NJ, Onrato IM, Castro KG. Long-term risk of tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the united states. JAMA. 1997;278:304-7.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles