Improving outcome in perforated peptic ulcer emergency surgery by Boey scoring

Authors

  • Jasneet Singh Gulzar Department of Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital, VMMC, New Delhi, India
  • Shivani B. Paruthy Department of Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital, VMMC, New Delhi, India
  • Satya Vrat Arya Department of Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital, VMMC, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163585

Keywords:

Perforated peptic ulcer, Receiver operating characteristic, Area under curve

Abstract

Background: since perforation occurs in 2% of patients of peptic ulcer disease hence perforated peptic ulcer is one of the most common indications for emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Delayed treatment, older age, presence of shock on admission and American Society of Anesthetisiologist status (ASA) are the risk factors for prediction of complication and mortality. A delay of more than 24 hours increases the lethal status seven to eight fold and complications rate by three folds.

Methods: A study was undertaken with 50 diagnosed patients of peptic ulcer disease to predict their morbidity and mortality using risk stratified Boey Score.

Results: Perforated peptic ulcer is more common in males with younger age group and risk significantly increases with increase in Boey score. Pulmonary complications are commonest followed by surgical site infection. The accuracy in predicting morbidity and mortality with Boey score was 88.70%and 84.90% respectively.

Conclusions: Boey score is a simple and precise predictor of post-operative status of the patients with perforated peptic ulcer patients. Pre-operative prediction with Boey score goes a long way in reducing mortality and morbidity and requires timely management with aggressive treatment in such stratified high risk patients.

References

Lamme B, Mahler CW, van Till JW, van Ruler O, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. Relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis planned relaparotomy or relaparotomy on demand? Chirurg. 2005;76(9):856-67.

Ng E K, Chung SC, Sung JJ. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer perforation not caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Surg. 199 ;83:1779-81.

Nogueria C, Silva AS, Santos JN. Perforated peptic ulcer. Main factors of morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2003;27:782-7.

Hermansson M, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:566-72.

Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccini G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L. Significant factors associated with fatal outcomes in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2338-40 .

Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Ohtoten P, Laitinen SO. Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:446-51.

Sillakivi T, Lang A, Tein A, Peetsalu AE. Evaluation of risk factors for mortality in surgically treated perforated peptic ulcer. Hepatogastroenterol. 2000;47:1765-8.

Kujath P, Schwandner O, Bruch HP. Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastro duodenal ulcer following emergency surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387:298-302.

Svanes C, Lie RT, Svanes K. Adverse effect of delayed treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:168-75 .

Graham R. The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Gynae Obstet. 1937;64:235-8.

Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N, Badrinath S. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on ulcer recurrence rate after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer: retrospective and prospective randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 2001;88(8):1054-8.

Ng EK, Lam YH, Sung JJ, Yung MY, To KF, Chan AC. Eradication of helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation: randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231(2):153-8 .

Rix TE, Bates T. Preoperative risk scores for prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:16.

Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A. Risk Stratification in Perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205:22-6.

Lee F, Leung KL, Lai BS. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. Arch Surg. 2001;136:90-4.

Linder MM, Walcha, Feldmann U. The Mannheim Peritonitis index. An instrument for intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirug. 1987;58:84-92.

Notash AY, Salimi J, Rahimian H. Evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index and Multiple Organ Failure Score in patients with peritonitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005;24:197-200.

Schein M, Gecelter G, Frienkel Z. APACHE II in emergency operation for perforated ulcers. Aaam J Surg. 1990;22:49-53.

Mishra A, Sharma D, Raina VK. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22:49-53.

Lau WY, Leow CK. History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcer. World J Surg. 1997;21(8):890-6.

Sarath Chandra S, Siva Kumar S. Definitive or conservative surgery for perforated gastric ulcer? An unsolved problem. Int J Surg. 2008;25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.037.

Aziz F, Geibel J, MD, DSc, MSc, AGAF surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1950689-overview Updated. Accessed on 27 April 2016.

Fry D, Pearlstein L, Fultron. Multisystem Organ Failure. Ach Surg. 1985;202:685-93.

Agarwal S, Sharma D, Raina VK. Arterial pH and arterial oxygenation are not essential for risk stratification in perforation peritonitis .Indian J Gastroenterol. 1999;18:5-6 .

Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index. An instrument for the intraoperative, prognosis of peritonitis. Chirug. 1987;58:84-92.

Arici C, Mesci A, Dincer D. Analysis of risk factors predicting mortality and morbidity of peptic ulcer perforation. Int Surg. 2007;92:147-54.

Billing A, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using Mannheim Peritonitis Indexin2003 patients. Peritonitis study group. Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):209-13.

Ermolov AS, Bagdat” ev VE, Chudorvor EV, Rozhnov AV. Evaluation of the Mannheim peritonitis Index. Vestskhir ImII Grek. 1996;155:22-3

Fugger R, Rogy M, Herbst F, Schemer M, Schultz F. Validation of Mannheim peritonitis index. Chirurg. 1988;59:598-601.

Donati A, Ruzzi M, Adrario E, Pelaia P. A new and feasible model for predicting operative risk. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:393-9.

Irvin TT. Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: a case for risk stratification in elderly patients. Br J Surg. 1989;76:216-8.

Lohsiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S. Perforated peptic ulcer clinical presentation, surgical outcomes and Accuracy of Boey scoring system in predicting post-operative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2009;33:80-5.

Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Kvaløy JT, Glomsaker T, Søreide K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(3):347-54.

Karthick P, Chidambaram K, Sowmya T. Role of laprostomy in septic abdomen cases. Internet J Health. 2010;13:1.

Uccheddu A, Floris G, Altana ML. Surgery of perforated peptic ulcer in elderly: evaluation of factors influencing prognosis. Hepatogastroenterol. 2003;50:1956-8.

Noguiera C, Silva AS, Santos JN. Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2003;27:782-7.

Hermansson M, Stael von Holstein C, Zilling T. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:566-72 .

Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G. Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenerol. 2003;9:2338-40.

Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment and prognosis. World J Surg. 2000;24:277-83.

Shan YS, Hsu HP, Hsieh YH. Significance of intra-operative peritoneal culture of fungus in perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1215-9.

Daniel T. Dempsey. Stomach. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 11th ed; 26:908-910.

Anand BS, Katz J. Peptic ulcer disease. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/181753-overview#a4. Accessed on 09 January 2015.

Gastrointestinal perforation. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2016. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastrointestinal_perforation.

Grassi R, Romano S, Pinto A. Gastro duodenal perforation: conventional plain films, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol 2004;50:30.

Baker RJ. Perforated duodenal ulcer Masters of surgery 5th ed.Vol.1. 78: 891-901.

Stabile BE. Redefining the role of surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer in this helicobacter pylori era. Ann Surg. 2000;231:159.

Yahchouchy E, Debet A, Fingerhut A. Crack cocaine-related prepyloric perforation treated laparoscopically. Surg Endosc. 2001;16:220.

Donavan AJ, Berna TV, Donovan JA. Perforated duodenal ulcer. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1166.

Kauffman GL. Duodenal ulcer disease: treatment by surgery, antibiotics or both. Adv Surg. 2000;34:121.

Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosec. 2004;18:1013.

Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.Br J Surg. 2000;91:481.

Koccer B, Surmeli S, Solak C. Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer formation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:565- 70.

Janik J, Chwirot P. Perforated peptic ulcer-time trends and patterns over 20 years. Med Sci Monit. 2000;369-72.

Lanas A, Serrano P, Bajador E. Evidence of aspirin use in both upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:683-68.

Barczynski M, Res F, Cichon S. Perioperative mortality for perforated duodenal and gastric ulcer-analysis of 226 patients. Prezeg Lek. 1999;56:192-7.

Calam J, Baron JH. ABC of the upper gastrointestinal tract: pathophysiology of duodenal and gastric ulver and gastric cancer. BMJ. 2001;323:980-2.

Hojgaard L, Mertz Nielsen A. Peptic ulcer pathophysiology: acid, bicarbonate, and mucosal function. Scand J GastroenterolSuppl. 1996;216:10-5.

Debongnie JC, Wibin E, Timmermans M. Are perforated gastroduodenal ulcers related to Helicobacter pylori infection? Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1995;58:208-12.

Serejo LG, da Silva- Junior FP, Bastos JP. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after emergency abdominal surgery. Respir Med. 2007;101:808-13.

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250-78.

Arias CA, Quintero G, Vanegas BE. Surveillance of surgical site infections: decade of experience at a Columbian tertiary care center. World J Surg. 2003;27:529-33.

So JB, Yam A, Cheah WK. Risk factors related to operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1702-7.

Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1195-207.

Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Ohtonen P. Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:446-51.

Soreide K, Thorsen K, Soreide JA. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2014;101:e51-64.

Thorsen K, Soreide J, Soreide K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population based multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring system. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(7):1261-8.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-10

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles