DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173424

Study on outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Subha Kanesh S. K., Govindarajan P.

Abstract


Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is being performed in increasing numbers since 1995. Now laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has been accepted as good alternate to open procedure as seen in various other abdominal surgeries. This was the basis of the present study. So, the present study was designed to analyse and compare the outcome of Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and Open donor nephrectomies.

Methods: The prospective and observational study was conducted at Stanley Medical College in Department of Urology in 61 Patients aged between 25-50 years who underwent left donor nephrectomy The Mean operating time, warm ischemic time, blood loss, analgesic requirement and duration of hospital stay were recorded and analysed statistically.

Results: Out of 61 donor nephrectomies, 16 kidneys harvested by laparoscopic method with only 2 (12%) conversion to open due bleeding. Mean operating time was 179.9±47.6 minutes. Present study showed mean blood loss of (163±93 ml). Analgesic requirement of the LDN (mean 1.25 days) was significantly lower when compared to open group (mean 3.75 days). The present study shows duration of hospital stay was lower in LDN (mean 5.1days).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an effective, safe and rewarding though it is time consuming and technically challenging. The analgesic requirement, duration of hospital stay and the blood loss were less with the laparoscopic surgery. Results of graft functioning of kidneys in both procedures were equivalent. So laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be made as the procedure of choice in future.


Keywords


LDN, Warm ischemic time

Full Text:

PDF

References


DeVita, Lawrence VT, Preface TS, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four-year John Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 1999;14(9):2090-3.

Carrel A. The Operative technique of vascular anastomoses and visceral transplantation. Lyon Med. 1902;98:859.

Jaboulay M. Kidney graft at elbow crease by welding arte. Bull Lyon Med. 1906;107:575.

Voronoy Yu Yu. On the blockage of the reticuloendothelial apparatus. Siglo Med. 1936;97:296.

Gill IS, Carbone JM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 1994;8:143-6.

Rao MM, Russell CH. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Aust N ZJ Surg. 2005;75:6-9.

Arvind NK, Kumar A. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: An indian perspective. Indian J Urol. 2002;19:29-37.

Wolf Js, Jr. Tchetgen MB, Merion RM. Hand assisted Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol. 1998;52:885-7

Slakey DP, Wood JC, Hender D, Thomas R, Cheng S. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy, advantages of the hand assisted method. Transplant. 68:581-3.

Gill Is. Consortium establishes criteria for single port surgery. Renal and Urology. 2008. Available at: news.com/article/119754htm.

Soble JJ, Gill Is. Needlescopic urology: incorporating 2 mm instruments in laproscopic surgery. Urol. 1998;52:187-94.

Mostafa G, Matthews BD, Sing Rf, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Mini-laproscopic versus laproscopic approach to appendicectomy. BMC Surg. 2001;1:4.

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaprascopic versus conventional laprascopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458-64.

Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc. 1997;29(1-2):138-9.

Sinha T, Varma PP, Srivastava A, Karan SC, Sandhu AS, Sethi GS, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic with conventional open donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation. Med J Armed Forces India. 2006;62(3):236-8.

Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open. Transplantation. 1999:67(5):722-8.

Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Ho E, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997;226:483-90.

Kumar A, Mandhani A, Verma BS. Expanding the livingrelated donor pool in renal transplantation: use of marginal donors. J Urol. 2000;163:33-8.

Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the university of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol. 2004;171:47-54.

Eugene J, Schweitzer MD, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Carol H. Machan increased rates of donation with laproscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):392-400.