Evaluation of accuracy of four clinical scores and comparison with ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Authors

  • Prabhakar Subramaniyan Department of Surgery, LTMM College and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022, Maharashtra, India
  • Sandhya Padmanabhan Iyer Department of Surgery, LTMM College and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172108

Keywords:

Appendicitis, Ultrasound, Scoring system

Abstract

Background: The vagaries of presentation and the variability of signs in acute appendicitis are such that even the most experienced surgeons may remove normal appendices or conserve those with perforation. Diagnostic scoring systems and imaging techniques may reduce the number of unnecessary appendectomies.

Methods: 75 patients who presented with acute right Iliac fossa pain were analyzed using four different scoring systems. An abdominal ultrasound was also performed when necessary. The results of these scores, USG findings were compared to the intra operative findings and final histopathological report.

Results: The Alvarado score had the best positive predictive value with high sensitivity. The Fenyo score was most sensitive for males, whereas the Teicher score was most sensitive for females. The Teicher score was the most specific. The Ohmann score had the highest negative predictive value. Ultrasonography showed a low sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions: There was a 24% negative appendicectomy rate in our study. The Alvarado score is ideal for borderline cases where a quick decision needs to be taken. Ohmann’s score can be used to rule out appendicitis in the casualty setting as it has the best negative predictive value. Fenyo and Teicher’s score with their high sensitivity can be used to reduce the number of negative appendicectomies.

Author Biography

Prabhakar Subramaniyan, Department of Surgery, LTMM College and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022, Maharashtra, India

Professor, General Surgery

References

Puylaert JBCM, Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiol. 1986;158:355-60

Douglas MD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS. Randomized control trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score. BMJ. 2000;321:919-22.

Gallego MG, Fadrique B, Nieto MA, Calleja S, Fernandez-Acenero HJ, Ais G et al. Evaluation of Ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:37-40.

Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:557-64.

Teicher IRA, Landa B, Cohen M, Kabnick LS, Wise L. Scoring system to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 1983;198:753-9.

Fenyo G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision making in a suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir Scand. 1987;153:545-57

Ohmann C, Frante C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1999;134:993-6.

Rosai J. editor. Ackermann’s Pathology 8th edition Missouri: Mosby Inc; 1996:1.

Macklin CP, Radcliffe GS, Merei JM, Stringer MD. A prospective evaluation of the Modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in children. Ann R Coll Surg England. 1997;79:203-5.

Malik AA, Wani NA, Continuing diagnostic challenge of acute appendicitis: evaluation through modified Alvarado score. Aust NZ J Surg. 1998;68(7):504-5.

Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(7):644-50.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles