Abdominal skin incision closure with non-absorbable sutures versus staples- a comparative study

Authors

  • Vamseedharan Muthukumar Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sarveswaran Venugopal Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sureeskumar Subramaniam Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171000

Keywords:

Comfort, Cosmesis, Skin closure, Staples, Sutures, Surgical site infection

Abstract

Background: Bacterial smartness and innovations have clearly outsmarted and drained the antibiotic discovery pipelines of pharmaceutical brains throughout the globe. Postoperative infection is a major cause of antibiotic use. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of using non-absorbable suture materials and staples for abdominal skin incision closure in terms of the occurrence rate of surgical site infections, the level of comfort experienced by patient and the cosmetic acceptability of scar by the patient.

Methods: A randomized control study conducted at the general surgical department of a tertiary hospital in Southern India. The final scores of the study in the categories of surgical site infection, pain and cosmesis were analyzed using Students t-test or Anova test.

Results: The use of staples to close skin incision in laparotomy cases reduces surgical site infection, improves the perception of cosmetic appearance of scar to the patient and adds to the comfort of patient by reducing the pain experienced by the patient. The subgroup of population who may comprehensively benefit are patients below 40 years, middle and high socio economic status population, clean and clean contaminated surgeries where incision length is more than 5cm.

Conclusions: The results of this study illustrated the fact that the use of staples in closure of skin incision in laparotomy case especially in selected subgroup of population significantly reduces the surgical site infection, hence slashing the use of antibiotics and in turn has the potential to reduce the incidence of antibiotic resistance.

Author Biographies

Vamseedharan Muthukumar, Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India

DNB Post Graduate

Sarveswaran Venugopal, Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India

Head of the Department and Senior Consultant.

Sureeskumar Subramaniam, Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Siddhapudur, Coimbatore-641044, Tamil Nadu, India

Junior Consultant

References

Nathan C, Cars O. Antibiotic resistance- problems, progress, and prospects. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1761-3.

Antibiotic resistance: long-term solutions require action now. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2013;13(12):995.

Schein M. Wound Management. In: Schein's Common Sense Emergency Abdominal Surgery; 2009:573-579.

Stillman RM, Bella FJ, Seligman SJ. Skin Wound Closure: The effect of various wound closure methods on susceptibility to infection. Arch Surg. 1980;115:674-5.

Ranaboldo CJ, Rowe-Jones DC. Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. Br J Surg. 1992;79(11):1172-3.

Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R, Nel CJ. A comparison of a disposable skin staple and nylon sutures for wound closure. S Afr Med J. 1982;62(11):371-2.

Eldrup J, Wied U, Andersen B. Randomised trial comparing Proximate staple with conventional skin closure. Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):501-2.

Lubowski D, Hunt D. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate staples with sutures. Aust N Z J Surg. 1985;55(4):405-6.

Shantz SJA, Vernon J, Morshed S, Leiter J, Stranges G. Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):6.

Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID, Vouloumanou EK, Mamais I, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Sutures versus staples for the management of surgical wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg. 2011;77(9):1206-21.

Shuster M. Comparing skin staples to sutures. Can Fam Physician. 1989;35:505-9.

Roth JH, Windle BH. Staple versus suture closure of skin incisions in a pig model. Can J Surg. 1988;31(1):19-20.

Kanegaye J, Vance C, Chan L, Schonfeld N. Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits. J Pediatr. 1997;130(5):808-13.

Cars O. Securing access to effective antibiotics for current and future generations. Whose responsibility? Ups J Med Sci. 2014;119(2):209-14.

Gatt D, Quick C, Owen-Smith M. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67(5):318-20.

Stockley I, Elson RA. Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(2):76-8.

Lennihan R, Mackereth M. A comparison of staples and nylon closure in varicose vein surgery. Vasc Surg. 1975;9(4):200-3.

Stillman RM, Marino CA, Seligman SJ. Skin staples in potentially contaminated wounds. Arch Surg. 1984;119(7):821-2.

Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):682-90.

Ritchie AJ, Rocke LG. Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Injury. 1989;20(4):217-8.

Hemming K, Pinkney T, Futaba K, Pennant M, Morton D, Lilford R. A Systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures. PloS one. 2013;8(10):75132.

Rahbari N, Knebel P, Diener M, Seidlmayer C, Ridwelski K, Stöltzing H et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery- Is there any consensus? BMC surgery. 2009;9(1):8.

Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, Endo S, Kawada J, Nakahira S et al. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9898):1105-12.

Aabakke AJ, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):878-84.

Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):265.e1-4.

Newman JT, Morgan SJ, Resende GV, Williams AE, Hammerberg EM, Dayton MR. Modality of wound closure after total knee replacement: are staples as safe as sutures? A retrospective study of 181 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2011;5(1):26.

Singh B, Mcgarvey C. Staples for skin closure in surgery. BMJ. 2010;340:c403.

Chandrashekar N, Prabhakar G, Shivakumarappa G, Tauheed F. A comparative study between skin sutures and skin staples in abdominal surgical wound closure. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(28):5180-6.

Chavan D, Metan BB, Kadlewad S, Bharath S. Study of skin staples and conventional sutures for abdominal clean wound skin closure: a randomized control trial. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014;3(20):5626-36.

Karbhari S, Patil R, Bhavikatti A. Study of skin staples and conventional suture for abdominal skin wound closure. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2012;3(7):369-72.

Simcock J, Armitage J, Dixon L, MacFarlane K, Robertson G, Frizelle F. Skin closure after laparotomy with staples or sutures: a study of the mature scar. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(9):656-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles